Child Support - 1999

The case shown here are derived from the lawindexpro case law database. lawindexpro is a low cost case law database, with over 260,000 case listings, and over 200,000 links to full text judgments. The free service below shows the core information on the case, but is restricted in several ways. A small proportion of cases do allow access to the full lawindexpro information. These cases are selected at random, and may be different on your next visit. The active links through to lawindexpro are extremely powerful allowing full access to all linked cases.  

This page lists 9 cases, and was prepared on 27 October 2012.

Regina -v- Child Support Agency ex parte Anthony Michael Gibbons [1999] EWHC Admin 144
16 Feb 1999 Admn	Child Support	Casemap 1 Cites 1 Citers
	Link[s] omitted

'F' -v- Child Support Agency [1999] EWHC Admin 262
25 Mar 1999 Admn	Child Support
	A party refusing to agree to a blood sample must be in peril of having adverse inferences drawn against him in any paternity dispute. This applied even where the law provided a presumption of paternity, and was capable of overriding that presumption.
	Child Support Act 1991 27 - Child Support Act 1991 27 - Child Support Act 1991 27
	Link[s] omitted

MKJ and BKJ [1999] EWHC Admin 374
29 Apr 1999 Admn	Child Support
	Maintenance Orders (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1972
	Link[s] omitted

Regina -v- Secretary of State for Social Services, Ex P W
19 May 1999 FD	Child Support
	A granting of a parental responsibility order to a man by consent where the application was not on the basis of actual paternity, could still be used to evidence paternity for the purposes of Child Support.
	Children Act 1989 4(1)(a)

Nicholas Dollar -v- Child Support Officer Dorothy Britton [1999] EWCA Civ 1468
24 May 1999 CA	Child Support
	Link[s] omitted

Regina -v- Child Support Agency ex parte Anthony Michael Gibbons [1999] EWCA Civ 1786
8 Jul 1999 CA	Child Support	Casemap 1 Cites
	[ Bailii ]

Hackshaw -v- Hackshaw
29 Jul 1999 FD	Child Support
	Even though in some circumstances there was no formal requirement imposed on magistrates by statute to give reasons for their decision, where that decision was capable of being appealed the giving of reasons was greatly to be encouraged, since in the event of a success at appeal, the appeal court need not order a re-hearing.
	Maintenance Orders Act 1958 4 (2) (a)

Regina -v- Housing Benefit Review Board of Swale Borough Council ex parte Simon Stuart Marchant
17 Nov 1999 CA	Benefits, Child Support	Casemap 1 Cites
	A party in a separated couple where primary residence was with the other party, had staying contact, but the child benefit remained unapportioned. That party was not able to claim housing benefit which would reflect his need for larger accommodation to facilitate that staying contact. The decision was an administrative exercise as to whether the child was 'normally living' with him.
	Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 137

Huxley -v- Child Support Officer and Another [1999] EWCA Civ 3015
14 Dec 1999 CA	Child Support
	Link[s] omitted