Income Tax - 2000
Income Tax. See also Corporation Tax. Also general taxes management issues.
The case shown here are derived from the lawindexpro case law database.
lawindexpro is a low cost case law database, with over 260,000 case listings, and over 200,000 links to full text judgments. The free service below shows the core information on the case, but is restricted in several ways. A small proportion of cases do allow access to the full lawindexpro information. These cases are selected at random, and may be different on your next visit. The active links through to lawindexpro are extremely powerful allowing full access to all linked cases.
This page lists 27 cases, and was prepared on 13 May 2012.
| | |
| Océ Van Der Grinten Nv -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00231 |
|
25 Jan 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
Casemap

|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Feb 2000 CANI |
Income Tax, Northern Ireland |
|
| A tax inspector applying ex parte for an order allowing the raising of an extended time limit assessment on the grounds of fraud, wilful default or neglect, was obliged to provide the special commissioner with all the information necessary to make the judgment without being misleading or omitting relevant detail. Nevertheless the standard was not the same as for ex parte applications where the consequences would not be limited by the right of appeal of a party. |
| | |
| Trustees of BT Pension Schemes and others -v- Clark (HM Inspector of Taxes) [2000] EWCA Civ 55 |
|
24 Feb 2000 CA |
Income Tax |

1 Cites
|
| Whether pension fund trustees were engaging in the sub-under-writing of share issues in return for commission payments, was a question of fact for the original court hearing the case, and it was not for an appeal court to set aside that finding of fact because of a mistake in the law. In this case the special commissioners that it was not trading would be re-instated. |
| Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 Sch D Case 1 |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| BT Pension Schemes & Others -v- Clark (HM Inspector of Taxes) [2000] EWHC Ch 141 |
|
24 Feb 2000 ChD |
Income Tax |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pardoe (Inspector of Taxes) -v- Energy Power Development Corporation |
|
2 Mar 2000 ChD |
Income Tax |
|
| Arrangements in the Acts to allow the revenue authorities to protect their position where payments were to be made overseas, by requiring the withholding of amounts equivalent to the tax payable, went as far as the Act expressly allowed, and no further. There is a substantial gap in such provision. No direction was available where there was only a prospect of anticipated future liability, rather than a present liability to make such a payment. |
| Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 775 776 777 |
| | |
| the Deanby Investment Co Ltd -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00234 |
|
20 Mar 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rigby -v- Jayatilaka (Inspector of Taxes) |
|
21 Mar 2000 ChD |
Income Tax |
|
| A notice issued by an inspector was not an agreement with the taxpayer. The tax inspector's calculation of the taxpayers liability upon receipt of the self assessment form could not be sufficient top prevent later amendments to the self-assessment returns. The assessment calculated by the inspector was treated under the Act as a calculation carried out on behalf of the taxpayer, and what was claimed was, in effect an agreement with himself. |
| Taxes Management Act 1970 9 |
| | |
| the Manufacturers’ Life Assurance Co Ltd -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00236 |
|
30 Mar 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Thompson (Inspector of Taxes) -v- Hart |
|
24 Apr 2000 ChD |
Income Tax, Corporation Tax |
|
| The system of tax relief called the business expansion scheme did not apply when land was given in exchange for shares in the qualifying company. The scheme gave relief for efforts in raising money. That could not be satisfied by property given in money's worth. |
| Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 289 |
| | |
| Clarke (Inspector of Taxes) -v- Perks; Macleod (Inspector of Taxes) -v- Same; Guild (Inspector of Taxes) -v- Newrick and Another Times, 03 May 2000; Gazette, 11 May 2000 |
|
3 May 2000 ChD |
Transport, Income Tax |
|
| The relief of foreign earnings given to those working as seafarers, did not apply to those working on a jack-up drilling rig with floating hull, and retractable legs., since this was not a ship. Being a seafarer involved the performance of duties on a ship. Definition in other acts suggested a vessel used in navigation. These rigs were without propulsion. Other decisions indicated the need for it to be used for navigation. |
| Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 193 Sch 12 |
| | |
| Norris (Inspector of Taxes) -v- Edgson |
|
30 May 2000 ChD |
Child Support, Income Tax |
|
| Where a father paid child support to the mother through the Child Support Agency, and where the mother had re-married and that subsequent marriage had also ended in divorce, the maintenance paid did not attract income tax relief under the section. The payment remained a 'qualifying payment' for claiming the tax relief only until the other party had re-married. A subsequent divorce did not defeat fulfilment of that condition. |
| Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 347B |
| | |
| White -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00260 |
|
31 May 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Accountant -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00258 |
|
8 Jun 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Regina -v- Special Commissioner of Income Tax ex parte Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Queen -v- Commissioners of Inland Revenue ex parte Ulster Bank Ltd [2000] EWHC Admin 354 |
|
14 Jun 2000 Admn |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Save & Prosper Securities Ltd -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00251 |
|
9 Aug 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
Casemap
1 Cites
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| John Lewis Properties Plc -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00255 |
|
5 Sep 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Venables and Another -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00265 |
|
18 Sep 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mepc Holdings Ltd -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00256 |
|
27 Sep 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Lee -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00257 |
|
4 Oct 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Vernede, Executors of -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00259 |
|
9 Oct 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Woodhall -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00261 |
|
10 Oct 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Silk -v- Inspector of Taxes [2000] UKSC SPC00262 |
|
18 Oct 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Black (Deceased) -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00263 |
|
23 Oct 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mallender and others -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00264 |
|
9 Nov 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ferguson and others -v- Inland Revenue [2000] UKSC SPC00266 |
|
14 Nov 2000 SCIT |
Income Tax |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Barry Clarke Cook (Her Majesty's Inspector of Taxes) -v- Andrew John Billings and others [2000] EWCA Civ 309 |
|
7 Dec 2000 CA |
Income Tax, Company |
|
| Between them, several shareholders held all the shares of a company, but each owned less than thirty per cent. They claimed BES relief. The tax inspector asserted that they were deemed to be associates of each other under the section, and that accordingly each had an interest in more than thirty per cent of the company, and the relief was not available. The definition of 'associate' was not to be artificially restricted. |
| Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 417(3) 291(8) |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Carstairs (Inspector of Taxes) -v- Sykes |
|
20 Dec 2000 ChDHart J |
Income Tax, Taxes Management |
|
| The taxpayer had claimed tax relief for certain periods (approximately six years) when he was living abroad. The Crown appealed a decision of the commissioners discharging their assessment to tax. Held: There is a distinction in law between the residence abroad and absence for the purposes of tax relief. The taxpayer can be resident, but absent abroad. For the purposes of the provisions of schedule E tax deductions on foreign earnings, the taxpayer should not be free to include periods when he was neither resident, nor ordinarily resident, when aggregating the qualifying period of absence. Whether someone was at any particular moment absent from the UK could only be answered in the context of the question. In this context that, must require the court to give to meaning of a qualifying period absence in the sense of not being physically present in the place of residence. |
| Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 193(1) Sch E |
|