Intellectual Property - 2000
Intellectual Property Law; Copyright, Designs, Patents, Passing Off, confidentialty and so on. See also Banking for confidentiality issues.
The case shown here are derived from the lawindexpro case law database.
lawindexpro is a low cost case law database, with over 260,000 case listings, and over 200,000 links to full text judgments. The free service below shows the core information on the case, but is restricted in several ways. A small proportion of cases do allow access to the full lawindexpro information. These cases are selected at random, and may be different on your next visit. The active links through to lawindexpro are extremely powerful allowing full access to all linked cases.
This page lists 1095 cases, and was prepared on 28 October 2012.
| | |
| Re Prendergast's Applications [2000] RPC 446 |
|
2000 ChDNeuberger J |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| The applicant attempted to patent the use of two known pharmaceuticals to treat the folowing: "battle fatigue, combat stress reaction, post-traumatic stress disorder in civilian and military emergency situations, neurological symptoms associated with chemical warfare and nausea associated with chemical or biological warfare." Held: The specification contained no information to support the claim that the products in question would have any effect on these ailments. Neuberger J upheld the Comptroller's rejection of the claim on the ground that it was not supported by the description. |
| Patents Act 1977 |
| | |
| Pharmedica GMBH's Trade Mark Application [2000] RPC 536 |
|
2000 ChDPumfrey J |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The tribunal was asked whether an assignee of a trademark should be substituted in existing opposition proceedings for the assignor. The assignment had taken place after the proceedings had begun. Held: A tribunal has an inherent power to regulate its own proceedings. Pumfrey J: "Turning to the present case, I must first deal with the question whether the three-month time limit on oppositions was, as the hearing officer decided in this case, … being circumvented. In my judgment, it plainly is not. Once the proceedings are on foot the time limit has ceased to be relevant to those proceedings at all." After referring to Industrie Chimiche Italia Centrale, Pumfrey J continued: "The effect of a substitution is that the party substituted carries on the original proceedings. He does not, by reason of substitution, become entitled to plead, if the pleadings are over, or file evidence, if the evidence is in, otherwise than by making application in the same manner as the original opponent would be obliged to apply if it wished to be allowed to revisit the pleadings or the evidence. No question of circumventing any time limit arises. So I do not think that to permit substitution offends against the requirements of the Act requiring an opposition to be started within three months of publication." |
| | |
| Aktiebolaget Volvo -v- Heritage (Leicester) Ltd [2000] FSR 253 |
|
2000
|
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
|
| | |
| Surene Pty Ltd -v- Multiple Marketing Ltd C000479899/1 |
|
2000 ETMR |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| (Cancellation Division) (year?) The proprietor, Multiple Marketing, distributed the applicant for revocation's products under the trade mark BE NATURAL. Held: The application had been made in bad faith: "Bad faith is a narrow legal concept in the CTMR system. Bad faith is the opposite of good faith, generally implying or involving, but not limited to, actual or constructive fraud, or a design to mislead or deceive another, or any other sinister motive. Conceptually, bad faith can be understood as a "dishonest intention". This means that bad faith may be interpreted as unfair practices involving lack of any honest intention on the part of the applicant of the CTM at the time of filing. Bad faith can be understood either as unfair practices involving lack of good faith on the part of the applicant towards the Office at the time of filing, or unfair practices based on acts infringing a third person's rights. There is bad faith not only in cases where the applicant intentionally submits wrong or misleading by insufficient information to the Office, but also in circumstances where he intends, through registration, to lay his hands on the trade mark of a third party with whom he had contractual or pre-contractual relations." |
| | |
| Pension Benefits T0931/95 |
|
2000 EPOBA |
European, Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
The applicant sought a European patent for a method of calculating and controlling pensions benefits. The claim was "1. A method of controlling a pension benefits program by administering at least one subscriber employer account on behalf of each subscriber employer's enrolled employees each of whom is to receive periodic benefits payments, said method comprising: providing to a data processing means information from each said subscriber employer defining the number, earnings and ages of all enrolled employees of the said subscriber employer; determining the average age of all enrolled employees by average age computing means; determining the periodic cost of life insurance for all enrolled employees of said subscriber employer by life insurance cost computing means; and estimating all administrative, legal, trustee, and government premium yearly expenses for said subscriber employer by administrative cost computing means;
the method producing, in use, information defining each subscriber employer's periodic monetary contribution to a master trust, the face amount of a life insurance policy on each enrolled employee's life to be purchased from a life insurer and assigned to the master trust and to be maintained in full force and effect until the death of the said employee, and periodic benefits to be received by each enrolled employee upon death, disability or retirement." Held: A computer programmed to carry out the unpatentable method was not within the categories of Art.52(2) – the fact that it was a physical thing ("concrete") was enough to take the case out of Art.52(2). It was really a method of doing business. It also rejected the apparatus claim. It acknowledged the 'technical effect' test: "According to the case law of the boards of appeal the use of the term "invention" in Article 52(1) EPC in conjunction with the so-called "exclusion provisions" of Article 52(2) and (3) EPC, which mention subject-matter that "in particular shall not be regarded as inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1", is understood as implying a "requirement of technical character" or "technicality" which is to be fulfilled by an invention as claimed in order to be patentable. Thus an invention may be an invention within the meaning of Article 52(1) if for example a technical effect is achieved by the invention or if technical considerations are required to carry out the invention . . . Claim 1 of the main request is, apart from various computing means mentioned in that claim, directed to a "method for controlling a pension benefits program by administering at least one subscriber employer account". All the features of this claim are steps of processing and producing information having purely administrative, actuarial and/or financial character. Processing and producing such information are typical steps of business and economic methods.
Thus the invention as claimed does not go beyond a method of doing business as such and, therefore, is excluded from patentability under Article 52(2)(c) in combination with Article 52(3) EPC; the claim does not define an invention within the meaning of Article 52(1) EPC." and "The feature of using technical means for a purely non-technical purpose and/or for processing purely non-technical information does not necessarily confer technical character to any such individual steps of use or to the method as a whole: in fact, any activity in the non-technical branches of human culture involves physical entities and uses, to a greater or lesser extent, technical means. . . Methods only involving economic concepts and practices of doing business are not inventions within the meaning of Article 52(1) EPC. A feature of a method which concerns the use of technical means for a purely non-technical purpose and/or for processing purely non-technical information does not necessarily confer a technical character to such a method." |
| | |
| American Home Products Corporation, Professor Roy Calne -v- Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited, Novartis Pharma AG [2000] RPC 547 |
|
2000 ChDLaddie J |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| A patent was granted for a product, produced by the bacterium streptomyces hygroscopicus, called rapamycin, which was useful to suppress transplant rejection. Because rapamycin was a known product at the priority date, it could not be patented: neither could its use as a treatment, because that would offend section 4(2) of the Patents Act 1977. The claim was for a specific type. Claims for infringement and cross claims for invalidity were heard. Held: The patent had been infringed and the allegation of insufficiency failed. The court refused to make a declaration of non-infringement as sought. |
| | |
| Mark: MOBILE COMPUTING 2173295 |
|
6 Jan 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Mobile Computing': Application No 2173295 |
|
6 Jan 2000 TMRMr R Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mobile Computing (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o01000 |
|
6 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Royal Shakespeare': Application No 2106088 OPP 47239; OPP 47239 |
|
7 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Royal Shakespeare (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o00200 |
|
7 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ROYAL SHAKESPEARE 2106088 |
|
7 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Jan 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Shop': Application No 2176423 |
|
10 Jan 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Shop (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o05100 |
|
10 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tartan Glory': Application No 2125558 OPP 47707; OPP 47707 |
|
11 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Tartan Glory (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o00300 |
|
11 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: TARTAN GLORY 2125558 |
|
11 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Escom': Application No 1521703 OPP 47795; OPP 47795 |
|
13 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
13 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Dr Vitold Mikhailovich Bakhir & Dr Yuri Geogevich Zadorozhny -v- Solenzara International Limited - Gb2253860 -v- Gb2257982 O/006/00 |
|
13 Jan 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Escom (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o00500 |
|
13 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Vitold Mikhailovich Bakhir and Yuri Georgevich Zadorozhny -v- Solenzara International Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o00600 |
|
13 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Dr Vitold Mikhailovich Bakhir & Dr Yuri Geogevich Zadorozhny -v- Solenzara International Limited - O/006/00 |
|
13 Jan 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mer (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o00700 |
|
18 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Mer': Application No 1385576 REV 9796 |
|
18 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o00800 |
|
18 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
18 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Device': Application No 2052547 OPP 45280 |
|
18 Jan 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
18 Jan 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Loaded (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o00900 |
|
21 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Loaded': Application No 2061604 OPP 45580 |
|
21 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| TH Goldschmidt Ag and Another -v- EOC Belgium Nv and others [2000] EWHC Patents 175 |
|
25 Jan 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| eFax Com Inc -v- Oglesby Unreported, 25 January 2000 |
|
25 Jan 2000 ChDParker J |
Intellectual Property |
|
| The claimant, an American company claimed in passing off against the defendant. It had come into the UK market and established a free service under the name. The defendant had operated a paid for service under the same name from some time before. Held: The claim should proceed, but an interim injunction was refused. In passing off, the words claimed to establish a reputation in the goods had to be more than descriptive. Words which might once have been distinctive could become descriptive by general usage, as had happened in this case. The common stock of language conception was becoming increasingly difficult to apply. Here the use of the word 'efax' had become descriptive. Any confusion or association between the two companies arose from the common meaning of the words and not from any reputation in the name belonging to the claimant. |
| | |
| Discovery Communications Inc -v- Discovery Fm Ltd |
|
25 Jan 2000 IHCS |
Intellectual Property, Scotland |
|
| It was no defence to an action for trade mark infringement to assert that although the registration covered activities of the type undertaken, the claimant did not actually provide services of that precise type. It is in the nature of such registrations that they reserve to the mark holder the right to develop his activities within the registration class. |
| Trade Marks Act 1994 10 |
| | |
| Ayumu Taniguchi & Juni-Ichi Tanabe -v- Toyo Kohan Co - O/013/00 |
|
27 Jan 2000 POMr B Cleary |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
27 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Legal Aid': Application No 2114581 |
|
27 Jan 2000 TMRMr D Morgan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Legal Aid (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o05600 |
|
27 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ayumu Taniguchi, Juni-Ichi Tanabe, Fumio Kunishige & Masao Komai -v- Toyo Kohan Co - O/012/00 |
|
27 Jan 2000 POMr B Cleary |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ayumu Taniguchi, Juni -Ichi Tanabe, Fumio Kunishige Masao Komai -v- Toyo Kohan Co Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o01200 |
|
27 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ayumu Taniguchi & Juni-Ichi Tanabe -v- Toyo Kohan Co - Gb9822134 4 O/013/00 |
|
27 Jan 2000 POMr B Cleary |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ayumu Taniguchi, Juni-Ichi Tanabe, Fumio Kunishige & Masao Komai -v- Toyo Kohan Co - Gb9822128 6 O/012/00 |
|
27 Jan 2000 POMr B Cleary |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ayumu Taniguchi Juni -Ichi Tanabe -v- Toyo Kohan Co Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o01300 |
|
27 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Martenelli (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o01100 |
|
27 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Martenelli': Application No 1277765 REV 9341 |
|
27 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
27 Jan 2000 TMRMr D Morgan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
28 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Rectification. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nirala (Trade Mark: Rectification) [2000] UKIntelP o01400 |
|
28 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Nirala': Application No 1312467 REC 9414 |
|
28 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Rectification |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Transpay': Application No 2002458 -v- 2011392 OPP 43493 / 44915 |
|
31 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'William Leith New Century Marques': Application No 2103948 OPP 46494 |
|
31 Jan 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: WILLIAM LEITH NEW CENTURY MARQUES 2103948 |
|
31 Jan 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Transpay (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o01500 |
|
31 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| William Leith New Century Marques (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o01800 |
|
31 Jan 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: TRANSPAY 2002458, 2011392 |
|
31 Jan 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Plasma Coatings Ltd and Hip Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o01900 |
|
1 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Plasma Coatings Limited And Hip Limited - O/019/00 |
|
1 Feb 2000 POMr M Wright |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Plasma Coatings Limited and Hip Limited - Gb2154614 O/019/00 |
|
1 Feb 2000 POMr M Wright |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mont Blanc Simplo Gmbh -v- Sepia Products Inc |
|
2 Feb 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property, Litigation Practice |
|
| In cases involving allegations of passing off, the judge in the case will usually be able himself to assess whether and to what extent there may have been confusion engendered in the minds of potential customers. Accordingly, there will not always be a necessity for claimants to bring forward evidence of actual confusion in the minds of the public. |
| | |
| 'Mediabase': Application No 1430384 -v- 1432461 REV 10322 / 10323 |
|
2 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mediabase (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o02600 |
|
2 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Molins Plc -v- GD Spa [2000] EWHC Patents 170 |
|
2 Feb 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: MEDIABASE 1430384, 1432461 |
|
2 Feb 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Premier Brands Uk Ltd -v- Typhoon Europe Ltd |
|
3 Feb 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property |
|
| The claimants owned a major brand mark used in the distribution of tea. The defendants operated in the sale of kitchen equipment. Whether a sign infringed a mark without due cause was to be resolved at trial by the judge on the facts. The infringer had to show that he had good cause for his use, and that was not discharged merely by demonstrating good faith. In this case however there was no evidence of any damage to the claimant's Mark's distinctive character or repute. |
| Trade Marks Act 1994 10 (3) |
| | |
| Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (Egeda) -v- Hostelería Asturiana SA (Hoasa). C-293/98; [2000] EUECJ C-293/98 |
|
3 Feb 2000 ECJ |
European, Media, Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| Europa The question whether the reception by a hotel establishment of satellite or terrestrial television signals and their distribution by cable to the various rooms of that hotel is an act of communication to the public or reception by the public is not governed by Directive 93/83 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission, and must consequently be decided in accordance with national law. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| St Bartholomews And The Royal London School Of Medicine And Dentistry, Nicholas Wald And Lynne George -v- Oxford Brookes University, University Of Edinburgh, Nigel Groome And Euan Wallace - O/037/00 |
|
3 Feb 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Mcgriskin - O/036/00 |
|
3 Feb 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Instance and Others -v- Denny Bros Printing Ltd and Others [2000] FSR 869 |
|
3 Feb 2000 ChDMr Justice Lloyd |
Intellectual Property, Litigation Practice |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The dispute arose between parties to without prejudice communications or who had obtained documents from such persons and were commercially connected with them. Held: An implied agreement would bind them as parties or by reason of the source of the documents in their hands. The without prejudice communications were governed by an implied agreement that they will not be used in the current or any subsequent litigation between the same or related parties. It was not appropriate to leave the issue to the foreign court to decide on admissibility, and an injunction was granted against their use. "The present dispute arises between persons who either were parties to the original communications or have obtained the documents from persons who were such parties, and, to the extent that it be relevant, are commercially and corporately connected with such parties. If there was an implied agreement the persons before me are either bound by it as parties or must be taken to be subject to it by reason of the source of the documents in their hands. In my judgment it is very strongly arguable, and indeed probable, that the without prejudice communications are indeed governed by an implied agreement that they will not be used in the current or any subsequent litigation between the same or related parties . . It is correct in my judgment to regard the protection as extending to subsequent litigation because otherwise on the one hand the public policy recognised by Lord Griffiths and other judges and on the other hand the expectation of the parties would not be fulfilled but rather would be subverted. The position may perhaps be different in practice between two parties who are brought together for example by the circumstances of a road accident and may never have anything else to do with each other, but the holders of patents in related areas, whether or not they are to be regarded as competitors, may well, through themselves or their licensees, come up against each other in a number of different commercial circumstances giving rise, not only among the litigation-prone, to several different disputes over time, such that it cannot be assumed that one piece of litigation is the last there will ever be." |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Mcgriskin (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o03600 |
|
3 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| St Bartholomews and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Nicholas Wald and Lynne George -v- Oxford Brookes University, University of Edinburgh, Nigel Groome and Euan Wallace (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o03700 |
|
3 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Mcgriskin - Gb2291342 O/036/00 |
|
3 Feb 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| St Bartholomews and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Nicholas Wald and Lynne George -v- Oxford Brookes University, University of Edinburgh, Nigel Groome and Euan Wallace O/037/00 |
|
3 Feb 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| David Page (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o10100 |
|
3 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: DAVID PAGE 2117243A, 2117243B |
|
3 Feb 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Monsanto and Others -v- Merk & Co Inc and Another [2000] EWHC Patents 154 |
|
4 Feb 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Anheuser-Busch Inc -v- Budejovicky Bodvar Narodni Podnik; Budejovicky Bodvar Narodni Podnik -v- Anheuser-Busch [2000] EWCA Civ 30 |
|
7 Feb 2000 CAPeter Gibson LJ, Ferris J, Judge LJ |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The registration of two trade marks ('Budweiser') with the identical names was against the Act since it would appear to encourage the very confusion the Act sought to avoid. Nevertheless, where there was genuine honest concurrent use, that use might justify registration. Clause 12 of the Act clearly envisaged honest concurrent use. Here the name Budweiser had been honestly applied historically for many years by more than one supplier. Held: Both appeals were dismissed. Peter Gibson LJ said: "there is a real tangible danger that to drop the name Budvar from Budweiser Budvar for BB's beer would be likely to increase the existing inevitable confusion of that beer with the more widely marketed and better known beer of AB. If one leaves section 12(2) aside, that is not something to be encouraged. I cannot accept that section 2, merely by preserving rights to sue in passing off, can convert what is otherwise an application objectionable because of the likelihood of deception and confusion into one which cannot be defeated by section 11. The section 11 test must be applied regardless of section 2. Subject to section 12(2) therefore, in my judgment the objection under section 11 is made out." |
| Trade Marks Act 1994 11 12 |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
7 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| L'Avec (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o02800 |
|
7 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Kango Tea Tree Shampoo (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o02900 |
|
7 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: RINA KETTY ESSENTIAL MUSK & DEVICE 2041042 |
|
7 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: KANGO TEA TREE SHAMPOO 2104167 |
|
7 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Kango Tea Tree Shampoo': Application No 2104167 INV 10027; INV 10027 |
|
7 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'L'Avec': Application No 1476964 OPP 41658; OPP 41658 |
|
7 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| 'Rina Ketty Essential Musk & Device': Application No 2041042 OPP 44751; OPP 44751 |
|
7 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rina Ketty Essential Musk Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o02700 |
|
7 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Montage (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o03000 |
|
8 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
8 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Limited -v- Comodo Technology Development Limited - O/142/00 |
|
8 Feb 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| 'Montage': Application No 1555946 OPP 44125; OPP 44125 |
|
8 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Limited -v- Comodo Technology Development Limited - Gb9818184 5 - Gb9818186 0 - Gb9818187 8 -v- Gb9818188 6 O/142/00; O/142/00 |
|
8 Feb 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Ltd -v- Comodo Technology Development Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o14200 |
|
8 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Easy Flossing (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o03100 |
|
9 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nigel Sullivan Tailyour -v- Smartwater Limited - O/032/00 |
|
9 Feb 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nigel Sullivan Tailyour -v- Smartwater Limited - Gb2245583 O/032/00; O/032/00 |
|
9 Feb 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nigel Sullivan -Tailyour -v- Smartwater Limited (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o03200 |
|
9 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: EASY FLOSSING 2116722 |
|
9 Feb 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Easy Flossing': Application No 2116722 OPP 48406; OPP 48406 |
|
9 Feb 2000 TMRMr R Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Hyde Park Residence Ltd -v- David Yelland, News Group Newspapers Ltd, News International Ltd, Reuben Murrell [2000] EWCA Civ 37; [2001] Ch 143 |
|
10 Feb 2000 CALord Justice Stuart-Smith, Lord Justice Aldous, And Lord Justice Mance |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The court considered a dispute about ownership and confidence in and copyright of of video tapes taken by Princess Diana before her death. Held: The courts have an inherent discretion to refuse to enforce of copyright. When assessing whether the copyright should be enforced the relevant issues would be ones arising from the work itself, and not from the ownership. Copyright rights are assignable in law, and therefore the court must apply different tests to those which applied to the breach of confidence. Here photographs had been copied, sold and republished. Even if some degree of use would be fair dealing, excessive use can render the use unfair: " the basis of the defence of public interest in a breach of confidence action cannot be the same as the basis of such defence to an action for infringement of copyright. In an action for breach of confidence the foundation of the action can fall away if that is required in the public interest, but that can never happen in a copyright action. The jurisdiction to refuse to enforce copyright, which I believe has been recognised comes from the court's inherent jurisdiction. It is limited to cases where enforcement of the copyright would offend against the policy of the law. " . . . a court would be entitled to refuse to enforce copyright if the work is: (i) immoral, scandalous or contrary to family life; (ii) injurious to public life, public health and safety or the administration of justice; (iii) incites or encourages others to act in a way referred to in (ii)." The attempt to establish a public interest defence failed. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| HFC Bank Plc -v- HSBC Bank Plc [2000] EWCA Civ 461; [2000] CPLR 197 |
|
10 Feb 2000 CANourse, Sedley, Judge LJJ |
Intellectual Property |
|
| The appellant bank, HFC, appealed against rejection of its claim that the name chosen by the respondent bank was confusingly similar to its own. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Hermes (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o03900 |
|
11 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
11 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
11 Feb 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nec Corporation - Gb9615001 6 O/038/00 |
|
11 Feb 2000 POMr S Probert |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04900 |
|
11 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nec Corporation - O/038/00 |
|
11 Feb 2000 POMr S Probert |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Hermes': Application No 2024696 OPP 44855; OPP 44855 |
|
11 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nec Corporation (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o03800 |
|
11 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Device': Application No 2055236 OPP 45681; OPP 45681 |
|
11 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| British Technology Group Limited -v- Boehringer Mannheim Corporation and Deputy Orthopaedics Inc [2000] EWHC Patents 148 |
|
13 Feb 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Daniel Finzi Reggea Spiced Rum': Application No 1560688 OPP 42556; OPP 42556 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Abercrombie Fitch (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04100 |
|
14 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Topps Company Inc -v- Tom Hannah (Agencies) ltd |
|
14 Feb 2000 OHCS |
Intellectual Property |
|
| When asking whether one kind of sweet, contained in a distinctive toy-like packaging constituted a passing off in respect of another, the court should recognise that though an adult might make many fine distinctions between the two, the view that mattered was that of a child who might buy the sweets. It was correct here for the judge to attempt to look at the packaging through the eyes of a child. |
| | |
| 'Abercrombie V Abercrombie & Fitch -v- Abercrombie & Fitch': Application No 1404289, 1404387, 1404389 OPP 41803; OPP 41804; OPP 42935 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| 'Reggae Reggae': Application No 2041505 OPP 45103; OPP 45103 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Abercrombie & Fitch/ Abercrombie/ - Abercrombie & Fitch': Application No 2005457 -v- 2005458 -v- 2026185 OPP 44372; OPP 43467; OPP 44371 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Reggae Reggae (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04300 |
|
14 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: DANIEL FINZI REGGEA SPICED RUM 1560688 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Daniel Finzi Reggea Spiced Rum': Application No 1560688 OPP 42548; OPP 42548 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: DANIEL FINZI REGGEA SPICED RUM 1560688 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: REGGAE REGGAE 2041505 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ABERCROMBIE 1404289, 1404387, 1404389 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ABERCROMBIE 2005457, 2005458, 2026185 |
|
14 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Daniel Finzi Reggea Spiced Rum (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04400 |
|
14 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Daniel Finzi Reggea Spiced Rum (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04500 |
|
14 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Abercrombie Fitch (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04000 |
|
14 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'One Touch View': Application No 2165204 |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Rose'Meyer |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mix Fm Black Mix (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04800 |
|
16 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Renervex (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04700 |
|
16 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Olympic': Application No 694833 |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRMr R Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Forwomen (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o04600 |
|
16 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: ONE TOUCH VIEW 2165204 |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Rose'Meyer |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Forwomen': Application No 1488881 OPP 44843; OPP 44843 |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Renervex': Application No 2104338 OPP 46296; OPP 46296 |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: "MIX FM" BLACK MIX 2110335 |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Olympic (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o08100 |
|
16 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Mix Fm' Black Mix': Application No 2110335 OPP 47083; OPP 47083 |
|
16 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| One Touch View (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o08000 |
|
16 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: OLIVER TWIST 1324658 |
|
17 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Sony Music Entertainment Inc and another -v- Prestige Records Ltd and another |
|
17 Feb 2000 ChD |
Costs, Intellectual Property |
|
| On a case management hearing, the defendants made admissions on which judgment was entered. The master reserved but later awarded costs. The defendants appealed against the costs order saying that the claimants had proceeded unnecessarily aggressively and had failed to disclose evidence in a timely way. The appeal took effect as a rehearing. Intellectual property cases should be subject to the same overriding objectives as in other cases. In this case the order was correct. An appeal to a High Court judge against an order for costs, was a rehearing, and such a judge was free to exercise his discretion accordingly. Where however the issue related to something specifically within the knowledge of the first instance judge such as the proportionality of the costs to the matter in cause this was to be disturbed only rarely. That the award was made on what was essentially a case management conference should not make a difference of principle. |
| | |
|
17 Feb 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
|
17 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Texicana (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o05200 |
|
17 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Oliver Twist': Application No 1324658 REV 9082 |
|
17 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oliver Twist (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o05300 |
|
17 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pzd': Application No 2047589 OPP 47049; OPP 47049 |
|
17 Feb 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pzd (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o05400 |
|
17 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Texicana': Application No 2105612 OPP 46443; OPP 46443 |
|
17 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Saint & Device': Application No 1513499 OPP 44794; OPP 44794 |
|
18 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Saint Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o05500 |
|
18 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: THE SAINT & DEVICE 1513499 |
|
18 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Form (Shape) Only (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o43300 |
|
19 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: FORM (SHAPE) ONLY 715087 |
|
19 Feb 2000 TMRMiss J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Nessie': Application No 2105301 OPP 46163; OPP 46163 |
|
21 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Siemens Medical Systems - O/063/00 |
|
21 Feb 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nessie (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o06200 |
|
21 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Siemens Medical Systems - Gb9717298 2 O/063/00; O/063/00 |
|
21 Feb 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Siemens Medical Systems Inc (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o06300 |
|
21 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PURE SILK SOPRANO DRY CLEAN 2124466 |
|
22 Feb 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| J Howitt & Son Ltd -v- Megaprint Group Limited - O/068/00 |
|
22 Feb 2000 POMr J J Macgillivray |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Designs - Designs/Design Right Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| J Howitt & Son Ltd -v- Megaprint Group Limited O/068/00; O/068/00 |
|
22 Feb 2000 DRMr J J MacGillivray |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Designs/Design Right Decisions - Designs |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pure Silk Soprano Dry Clean': Application No 2124466 OPP 47434; OPP 47434 |
|
22 Feb 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pure Silk Soprano Dry Clean (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o06400 |
|
22 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Ltd -v- Melih Abdulhayoglu (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o06700 |
|
23 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 3D Shape (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o06500 |
|
23 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '3D Shape': Application No 2005272 OPP 45406; OPP 45406 |
|
23 Feb 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Limited -v- Melih Abdullhayoglu - Gb9801764 3 - Gb9801765 3 - Gb9801767 6 -v- Gb9801768 4 O/067/00; O/067/00 |
|
23 Feb 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Limited -v- Melih Abdullhayoglu - O/067/00 |
|
23 Feb 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: BARON DE LA TORRE 2007814 |
|
24 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ACTIVE SPORT 2139537 |
|
24 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Active Sport (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o06900 |
|
24 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Allergan Inc and Another -v- Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 168 |
|
24 Feb 2000 PatC |
Litigation Practice, Intellectual Property |
|
| A claimant in patent infringement proceedings sought leave to join in the defendant's Spanish supplier as a joint tortfeasor. The application was refused because before exposing a foreign party to the expense of defending such proceedings there had to be shown an arguable case. Here what was shown was compatible with proper acts of a supplier supporting his customer with information as to the product being sold, the market and providing information which might assist the defendant to defend. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Active Sport': Application No 2139537 OPP 48005; OPP 48005 |
|
24 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Baron De La Torre': Application No 2007814 OPP 43934; 2007814 |
|
24 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Baron De La Torre (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o07000 |
|
24 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Peter Horn, Bernd Schmidt, Albrecht Schneckenburger Holger Hutzenlaub -v- Daimlerchrysler A G (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o07400 |
|
25 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
25 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Euroguard (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o07100 |
|
25 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Euromix (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o07200 |
|
25 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
25 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Peter Horn, Bernd Schmidt, Albrecht Schneckenburger and Holger Hutzenlaub -v- Daimler Chrysler Ag - Gb2324720 O/074/00; O/074/00 |
|
25 Feb 2000 POMr B Cleary |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Abv Engineering Pte Ltd -v- Eng Siang Ong (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o07500 |
|
25 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Abv Engineering Pte Ltd -v- Eng Ong Siang - O/075/00 |
|
25 Feb 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Peter Horn, Bernd Schmidt, Albrecht Schneckenburger And Holger Hutzenlaub -v- Daimler Chrysler Ag - O/074/00 |
|
25 Feb 2000 POMr B Cleary |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Euroguard': Application No 2015812 OPP 44120; OPP 44120 |
|
25 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Euromix': Application No 1566675 INV 10179; INV 10179 |
|
25 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Abv Engineering Pte Ltd -v- Eng Ong Siang - Gb2266111 O/075/00; O/075/00 |
|
25 Feb 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Device': Application No 2017195 OPP 47219; OPP 47219 |
|
28 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
28 Feb 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o07300 |
|
28 Feb 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Glaxo Group Limited and Others -v- Dowelhurst Limited and Another [2000] EWHC Ch 134; [2000] FSR 529 |
|
28 Feb 2000 ChDLaddie J |
Intellectual Property, European |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| Parallel importers could not be prevented from so acting by Trade Mark law unless it could be shown that the activity caused substantial damage to the specific substance of the Mark. If damage was shown, the owner could complain unless it would operate to breach European law. A mark owner could object to the re-application of his mark by such importers only if he had not received notice of such activity. This was irrespective of proof of damage, but knowledge of the importer's activities constituted notice. 'A trade mark is a badge, in the widest sense, used on or in relation to goods so as to indicate source.' |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pitman (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o07600 |
|
1 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pitman': Application No 1283825 OPP 33209 |
|
1 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| 'Adrenalin': Application No 1272101 -v- 1332727 -v- 1229890 -v- 1332733 -v- 1235690 -v- 1332734 -v- 1524250 REV 9593 / 9594 / 9595 / 9596; REV 9593 / 9594 / 9595 / 9596 / 9597 / 9608 / 9609 |
|
2 Mar 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Silverwood Spring Water Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o12100 |
|
2 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Medcalf -v- Mardell and others [2000] EWCA Civ 63 |
|
2 Mar 2000 CAPeter Gibson, Schiemann LJJ, Wilson LJ |
Torts - Other, Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Adrenalin (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o11900 |
|
2 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SILVERWOOD SPRING WATER & DEVICE 2028983 |
|
2 Mar 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ADRENALIN 1229890, 1235690, 1272101, 133 |
|
2 Mar 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
|
3 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE OLD FIRM 1524939 |
|
3 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clear Focus Imaging Inc -v- Contra Vision Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o07900 |
|
3 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Old Firm (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o07700 |
|
3 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clear Focus Imaging Inc -v- Contra Vision Limited - Gb2165292 O/079/00 |
|
3 Mar 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tusker': Application No 1555665 OPP 46244; OPP 46244 |
|
3 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Repeat': Application No 2030055 OPP 45003; OPP 45003 |
|
3 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Old Firm': Application No 1524939 REV 10604; REV 10604 |
|
3 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Tusker (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o08300 |
|
3 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
3 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Repeat (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o08200 |
|
3 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clear Focus Imaging Inc -v- Contra Vision Limited - O/079/00 |
|
3 Mar 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Multiload Technology Limited - Gb2262350 O/086/00; O/086/00 |
|
6 Mar 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Multiload Technology Limited (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o08600 |
|
6 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Multiload Technology Limited - O/086/00 |
|
6 Mar 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Glamour Calze Collants (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o08400 |
|
7 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: GLAMOUR calze & collants 1568121 |
|
7 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Dr Anthony Stephen De Silva Farmer -v- Moseley (Holdings) Ltd, Rtk Marine Ltd, Composite Industries Ltd, Christopher Brewer [2000] EWHC Patents 128 |
|
7 Mar 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Glamour Calze & Collants': Application No 1568121 OPP 45679; OPP 45679 |
|
7 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Val D'Isere (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o08500 |
|
7 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Val D'Isere': Application No 2013588 OPP 44825; OPP 44825 |
|
7 Mar 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| L'Oreal (UK) Limited & Another -v- Johnson & Johnson & Another [2000] EWHC Ch 129; [2000] FSR 686 |
|
7 Mar 2000 ChDMr Justice Lightman |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The claimant appealed against an order striking out their threat action for trade mark infringement, in respect of the words 'No Tears' when used for children's shampoo. Held: The court had to consider both the letter and the surrounding circumstances. A threat need not be direct, and conditionality may not be an answer. The thrust of the letter was a warning of the possibility in the future of proceedings for infringement, with contingencies on success of other proceedings. The threat was veiled and muffled by protestations of continuing indecision (which did not ring true) but the threat was sufficient (if not designed) to unsettle the Claimants and the threat was of trade mark infringement proceedings in respect of sales within the United Kingdom. |
| Trade Marks Act 1994 21 |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: VAL D'ISERE 2013588 |
|
7 Mar 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: (DEVICE) AEROPLANE 2171708 |
|
8 Mar 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| (Device) Aeroplane (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o12000 |
|
8 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: GAP CHALLENGE 2149765 |
|
9 Mar 2000 TMRMr J Parker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Gap Challenge (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o08700 |
|
9 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Gap Challenge': Application No 2149765 OPP 48772; OPP 48772 |
|
9 Mar 2000 TMRMr J Parker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Azrak-Harmway International Inc -v- Meccano Sa O/093/00; O/093/00 |
|
10 Mar 2000 DRMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Designs/Design Right Decisions - Designs |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Azrak-Harmway International Inc -v- Meccano Sa - O/093/00 |
|
10 Mar 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Designs - Designs/Design Right Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Party Land (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o09600 |
|
13 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
13 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Party Land': Application No 2128767 OPP 47881 |
|
13 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Le Shark & Device': Application No 2108092 OPP 46485; OPP 46485 |
|
14 Mar 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: LE SHARK & DEVICE 2108092 |
|
14 Mar 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bowthorpe Plc -v- Raychem Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o09400 |
|
14 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bowthorpe Plc -v- Raychem Limited - Gb2254739 O/094/00 |
|
14 Mar 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Bowthorpe Plc -v- Raychem Limited - O/094/00 |
|
14 Mar 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Le Shark Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o09800 |
|
14 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Booker Aquaculture Limited - Spc/Gb/98/049 O/216/00 |
|
15 Mar 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Booker Aquaculture Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o21600 |
|
15 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Booker Aquaculture Limited O/217/00 |
|
15 Mar 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Booker Aquaculture Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o21700 |
|
15 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Booker Aquaculture Limited O/216/00 |
|
15 Mar 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Booker Aquaculture Limited - Spc/Gb/98/050 O/217/00 |
|
15 Mar 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nutrinova Nutrition Specialities & Food Ingredients and Others -v- Scanchem UK Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 124 |
|
17 Mar 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Boston Scientific Limited, Boston Scientific International BV -v- Julio C Palmaz, Expandable Grafts Partnership; Palmaz's Patents [2000] EWCA Civ 83; [2000] RPC 631 |
|
20 Mar 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Coffee House Aroma': Application No 2025981 REV 9448; REV 9448 |
|
21 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Orange': Application No 2150718 |
|
21 Mar 2000 TMRMs J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: COFFEE HOUSE AROMA 2025981 |
|
21 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Coffee House Aroma (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o11000 |
|
21 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Orange (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o20900 |
|
21 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Mar 2000 TMRMiss J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| MCA Records Inc and Another -v- Charly Records Ltd and others Unreported, 22 March 2000 |
|
22 Mar 2000 ChDRimer J |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| A licence to record is a one-off event authorising recording for the period of the licence. |
| | |
| The Traveller'S Right To Know (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o11100 |
|
22 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE TRAVELLER'S RIGHT TO KNOW 2200078 |
|
22 Mar 2000 TMRMr C Hamilton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Traveller's Right To Know': Application No 2200078 |
|
22 Mar 2000 TMRMr C Hamilton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Miscellaneous (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o11400 |
|
23 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Ahp - Ahp Dermakind': Application No 2105514 -v- 2168957 OPP 46788 / 49659 |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: AHP 2105514, 2168957 |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Emilva (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o11500 |
|
23 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Miscellaneous': Application No 2108863 OPP 47739; OPP 47739 |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: MISCELLANEOUS 2108863 |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: MISCELLANEOUS 2026289 |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Miscellaneous (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o11300 |
|
23 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Miscellaneous': Application No Nt Size="2"2026289 OPP 47740; OPP 47740 |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Emilva': Application No 2061715 OPP 45542; OPP 45542 |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ahp Dermakind (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o11200 |
|
23 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tricorder': Application No 2123062 OPP 49075; OPP 49075 |
|
24 Mar 2000 TMRMr S Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
24 Mar 2000 TMRMr S P Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Tricorder (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o11700 |
|
24 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Mcl Parfums de Paris': Application No 2104616 OPP 46360; OPP 46360 |
|
27 Mar 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mcl Parfums De Paris (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o16700 |
|
27 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: MCL PARFUMS DE PARIS 2104616 |
|
27 Mar 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Limited - Gb9700759 5 O/182/00; O/182/00 |
|
28 Mar 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Limited - O/182/00 |
|
28 Mar 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o18200 |
|
28 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Freex (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o11800 |
|
29 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
29 Mar 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Freex': Application No 2144051 OPP 48325; OPP 48325 |
|
29 Mar 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Phonographic Performance Limited -v- Candy Rock Recording Limited [2000] EWCA Civ 97 |
|
30 Mar 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Santa & Rudy': Application No 1451403 -v- 1451405 OPP 42338/ 42339; OPP 42338/ 42339 |
|
31 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SANTA & RUDY 1451403, 1451405 |
|
31 Mar 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Santa Rudy (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o12200 |
|
31 Mar 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Caramel Apple Granny (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o12300 |
|
3 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: CARAMEL APPLE GRANNY 1588057, 1588224 |
|
3 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Caramel Apple Granny': Application No 1588057 -v- 1588224 OPP 44067 / 44068; OPP 44067 / 44068 |
|
3 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Zino Davidoff Sa -v- M & S Toiletries Limited [2000] ScotCS 98 |
|
4 Apr 2000 OHCSLord Kingarth |
Intellectual Property, Scotland |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Suit Express (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o12400 |
|
5 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SUIT EXPRESS 2027827 |
|
5 Apr 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'suit Express': Application No 2027827 OPP 45963; OPP 45963 |
|
5 Apr 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Brian Francis Hanby -v- Product Investment Limited & Allan Richard Hilton - Gb2318821 O/128/00 |
|
6 Apr 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Product Investment Ltd Allan Richard Hilton -v- Brian Francis Hanby (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o12800 |
|
6 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Brian Francis Hanby -v- Product Investment Limited & Allan Richard Hilton O/128/00 |
|
6 Apr 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Regina -v- Broadcasting Standards Commission, Ex Parte British Broadcasting Corporation [2000] EWCA Civ 116; [2001] QB 885 |
|
6 Apr 2000 CAThe Master Of The Rolls, Lady Justice Hale And Lord Mustill |
Media, Intellectual Property, Human Rights |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
The Act protects the privacy of a corporate body. A television company which secretly filmed in a company's store could be held to have infringed the privacy of the company by the Broadcasting Standards Commission. The Act went further than the Human Rights Convention in this respect, but there is no reason to limit the extent of the operation of the Act to match the convention. "An infringement of privacy is an affront to the personality, which is damaged both by the violation and by the demonstration that the personal space is not inviolate."
Lord Mustill said: "To my mind the privacy of a human being denotes at the same time the personal 'space' in which the individual is free to be itself, and also the carapace, or shell, or umbrella, or whatever other metaphor is preferred, which protects that space from intrusion. An infringement of privacy is an affront to the personality, which is damaged both by the violation and by the demonstration that the personal space is not inviolate." |
| Broadcasting Standards Act 1996 110 111 - European Convention on Human Rights |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Taste! (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o12600 |
|
7 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Taste!': Application No 2199175A |
|
7 Apr 2000 TMRMr C Hamilton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
7 Apr 2000 TMRMr C Hamilton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Osis': Application No 2139936 OPP 48286; OPP 48286 |
|
10 Apr 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Apr 2000 TMRMr G Attfield |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Rectification. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Advanced Technology Communications Limited -v- Permasign Limited - O/130/00 |
|
10 Apr 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Advanced Technology Communications Limited -v- Permasign Limited - Gb2291733 O/130/00; O/130/00 |
|
10 Apr 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Orascreen': Application No 2017179 REC 11468; REC 11468 |
|
10 Apr 2000 TMRMr G Attfield |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Rectification |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Dambuster': Application No 1385672 OPP 45086; OPP 45086 |
|
10 Apr 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Orascreen (Trade Mark: Rectification) [2000] UKIntelP o12700 |
|
10 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Advanced Technology Communications Ltd -v- Permasign Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o13000 |
|
10 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Apr 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Osis (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o13100 |
|
10 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Dambuster (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o12900 |
|
10 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Apr 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Auto -Stop (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o13300 |
|
12 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Auto -Stop (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o13400 |
|
12 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Conseal (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19700 |
|
12 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Kemiferm (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o13200 |
|
12 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Kemiferm': Application No 2003701 OPP 45101; OPP 45101 |
|
12 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Auto-Stop': Application No 2001492 OPP 44887; OPP 44887 |
|
12 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Auto-Stop': Application No 1589591 OPP 44888; OPP 44888 |
|
12 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 Apr 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Agnes Mcgriskin - Gb2291342 O/135/00 |
|
13 Apr 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clear Focus Imaging Inc -v- Contra Vision Limited - Gb2165292 O/137/00 |
|
13 Apr 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Agnes Mcgriskin - O/135/00 |
|
13 Apr 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clear Focus Imaging Inc -v- Contra Vision Limited - O/137/00 |
|
13 Apr 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Contra Vision Ltd -v- Clear Focus Imaging Inc (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o13700 |
|
13 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Agnes Mcgriskin (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o13500 |
|
13 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Polo/Lauren Co LP -v- PT Dwidua Langgeng Pratama International Freight Forwarders Case C-383/98; [2000] EUECJ C-383/98 |
|
14 Apr 2000 ECJ |
European, Customs and Excise, Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| Council regulations empowered customs officers of member states to seize goods suspected of being counterfeit or pirated and in breach of Trade Mark and other laws This applied even to goods which were merely seized in transit through a member state, from a non-EU source to a non-EU destination. The validity of the regulation was not capable of doubt, and no factor had been identified which could challenge its validity. The wording of the regulation expressly envisaged such action. |
| [ Europa ] - [ Europa ] - [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Invesco': Application No 1587403 OPP 43185; OPP 43185 |
|
14 Apr 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| David J Instance Ltd, David J Instance -v- Denny Bros Printing Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 112 |
|
14 Apr 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Invesco (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o24600 |
|
14 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
14 Apr 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ESP EASTENDERS 2157745 |
|
17 Apr 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Esp Eastenders (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o13600 |
|
17 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Esp Eastenders': Application No 2157745 OPP 48520; OPP 48520 |
|
17 Apr 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oxford Gene Technology Ltd -v- Affymetrix Inc, Affymetrix UK Ltd, Beckman Coulter Inc [2000] EWHC Patents 111 |
|
18 Apr 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nobody Knows Colour Better (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o13800 |
|
19 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: NOBODY KNOWS COLOUR BETTER 2156999 |
|
19 Apr 2000 TMRMiss J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Nobody Knows Colour Better': Application No 2156999 |
|
19 Apr 2000 TMRMs J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Chitlink Electronic International Limited -v- Golden Eagle Enterprises O/140/00; O/140/00 |
|
20 Apr 2000 DRMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Designs/Design Right Decisions - Designs |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: COFFEE EXPRESS 2021999 |
|
20 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Hans Plechinger -v- Converganza Ag & Alexander Brockhoff - Ep0778031 O/141/00; O/141/00 |
|
20 Apr 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Coffee Express': Application No 2021999 OPP 46754; OPP 46754 |
|
20 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Hans Plechinger -v- Converganza Ag & Alexander Brockhoff - O/141/00 |
|
20 Apr 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Hans Plechinger -v- Converganza Ag Alexander Brockhoff (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o14100 |
|
20 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Chitlink Electronic International Limited -v- Golden Eagle Enterprises - O/140/00 |
|
20 Apr 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Designs - Designs/Design Right Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Coffee Express (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o13900 |
|
20 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: RENNIE MACKINTOSH 2042882A |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE RENNIE MACKINTOSH COLLECTION 2042882B |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: AQUA FRESCA 1557879 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Mark: THE RENNIE MACKINTOSH COLLECTION 2042882B |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: RENNIE MACKINTOSH 2042882A |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE RENNIE MACKINTOSH COLLECTION 2042882B |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: BONETTI / BENETTI 2147788 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Bonetti -v- Benetti': Application No 2147788 OPP 48543; OPP 48543 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Aqua Fresca': Application No 1557879 OPP 43286; OPP 43286 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Rennie Mackintosh Collection': Application No 2042882B OPP 48997; OPP 48997 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Rennie Mackintosh': Application No 2042882A OPP 48996; OPP 48996 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Rennie Mackintosh Collection': Application No 2042882B OPP 49006; OPP 49006 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Rennie Mackintosh': Application No 2042882A OPP 49005; OPP 49005 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Rennie Mackintosh Collection': Application No 2042882B OPP 49024; OPP 49024 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Rennie Mackintosh': Application No 2042882A OPP 49023; OPP 49023 |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: RENNIE MACKINTOSH 2042882A |
|
27 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Rennie Mackintosh Collection (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o14600 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| The Rennie Mackintosh Collection (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o14800 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Rennie Mackintosh Collection (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o14400 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rennie Mackintosh (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o14700 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rennie Mackintosh (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o14500 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rennie Mackintosh (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o14300 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bonetti / Benetti (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o15000 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Aqua Fresca (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o14900 |
|
27 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Optima (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o15500 |
|
28 Apr 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
28 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 'Optima': Application No 1587585 OPP 45931; OPP 45931 |
|
28 Apr 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Wannabe': Application No 2057858 OPP 46024 |
|
2 May 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Wannabe (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o15600 |
|
2 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
2 May 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Riker (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o15900 |
|
4 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
4 May 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
4 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Trim (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o16000 |
|
4 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Trim': Application No 1270050 REV 10660; REV 10660 |
|
4 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| 'Riker': Application No 1524601 INV 8936; INV 8936 |
|
4 May 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PLANET HOLLYWOOD 2016188 |
|
5 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Minton': Application No 2031806 OPP 44566; OPP 44566 |
|
5 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Planet Hollywood (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o16100 |
|
5 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Planet Hollywood': Application No 2016188 OPP 45439 |
|
5 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Minton (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o16200 |
|
5 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
5 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
9 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o16300 |
|
9 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: NATURAL WHITE 1530537 |
|
9 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Device': Application No 2109228 OPP 47078; OPP 47078 |
|
9 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Natural White': Application No 1530537 OPP 41828; OPP 41828 |
|
9 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Natural White (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o16400 |
|
9 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PELLE PELLE MARC BUCHANAN 2029909 |
|
10 May 2000 TMRMr S P Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pelle Pelle Marc Buchanan': Application No 2029909 OPP 47888; OPP 47888 |
|
10 May 2000 TMRMr S Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pelle Pelle Marc Buchanan (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o16500 |
|
10 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Academy': Application No 1301046 REV 9214; REV 9214 |
|
12 May 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| British Telecommunications Plc -v- Ac Egerton Limited - Ep0683925 O/170/00; O/170/00 |
|
12 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| British Telecommunications Plc -v- A C Egerton Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o17000 |
|
12 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Heroes (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o16600 |
|
12 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 May 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Philosophy (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o16800 |
|
12 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Academy (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o16900 |
|
12 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Heroes': Application No 2104763 OPP 46838; OPP 46838 |
|
12 May 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 May 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| British Telecommunications Plc -v- Ac Egerton Limited - O/170/00 |
|
12 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 May 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Philosophy': Application No 1335163 REV 9206; REV 9206 |
|
12 May 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Limited -v- Comodo Technology Development Limited - O/171/00 |
|
15 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Limited -v- Comodo Technology Development Limited - Gb9818184 5, Gb9818186 0, Gb9818187 8 -v- Gb9818188 6 O/171/00; O/171/00 |
|
15 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cerise Innovation Technology Ltd -v- Comodo Technology Development Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o17100 |
|
15 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: WARNER'S PRIVATE PLEASURES 2102959 |
|
16 May 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
16 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Facchino (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o17300 |
|
16 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Ian David Slack -v- Scs Consultancy Services (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o17400 |
|
16 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Slack -v- SCS Consultancy Services Limited O/174/00 |
|
16 May 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Warner'S Private Pleasures (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o17200 |
|
16 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Warner's Private Pleasures': Application No 2102959 OPP 47093; OPP 47093 |
|
16 May 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Facchino': Application No 2113305 INV 9675; INV 9675 |
|
16 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Slack -v- SCS Consultancy Services Limited O/174/00; Pct/Gb96/02512 |
|
16 May 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: MEDORA OF LONDON 2005010 |
|
17 May 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Medora of London (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o17500 |
|
17 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Medora of London': Application No 2005010 REV/INV 9962; REV/INV 9962 |
|
17 May 2000 TMRM M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Crompton Lighting Limited -v- Emergi-Lite Safety Systems Limited - O/178/00 |
|
18 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Cathcart Proms': Application No 2113079 OPP 47565; OPP 47565 |
|
18 May 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Presidents Choice': Application No 1549573 OPP 45841; OPP 45841 |
|
18 May 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: CATHCART PROMS 2113079 |
|
18 May 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PRESIDENTS CHOICE 1549573 |
|
18 May 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nutrinova Nutrition Specialities & Food Ingredients -v- Scanchem UK Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 98 |
|
18 May 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Crompton Lighting Ltd -v- Emergi -Lite Safety Systems Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o17800 |
|
18 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Crompton Lighting Limited -v- Emergi-Lite Safety Systems Limited - Gb2059196 O/178/00; O/178/00 |
|
18 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cathcart Proms (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o17700 |
|
18 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Presidents Choice (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o17600 |
|
18 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
19 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Anglian Mode (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o18100 |
|
19 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Gann Respond (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o18000 |
|
19 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Anglian Mode': Application No 1366888 REV 10115; REV 10115 |
|
19 May 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Galaxy (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o17900 |
|
19 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Galaxy': Application No 2130853 OPP 47746 |
|
19 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ANGLIAN MODE 1366888 |
|
19 May 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| United Pan-Europe Communications N V -v- Deutsche Bank Ag [2000] EWCA Civ 166; [2000] 2 BCLC 461 |
|
19 May 2000 CAMorritt, Ward LJJ, Charles J |
Intellectual Property, Litigation Practice |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The claimant sought to prevent the misuse of what it said was its confidential information, identifying it by reference to specific documents in which it was said to be recorded. Held: That was a sufficient description because the defendant had "each of the documents in its possession and can see for itself what [the claimant] is referring to and could, if it had wished to do so, itself have put the documents in evidence on a confidential basis". |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Gann Respond': Application No 1546358 INV 9614; INV 9614 |
|
19 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: GANN RESPOND 1546358 |
|
19 May 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault Sa -v- Maxicar Spa and Another (Case C-38-98) |
|
23 May 2000 ECJ |
European, Intellectual Property |
|
| A French court found a company guilty of forgery by making parts for cars in breach of French laws governing registered designs. Such rights were not reflected in Italian law, and the applicants argued that an Italian court should not enforce such an order, as a breach of the right of free movement of goods. To refuse to recognise a decree of a court of another member state, the court must establish that the law was a misapplication of European law and against public policy. That could not be shown here. |
| | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company -v- Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals Inc, Napro Biotherapeutics Inc [2000] EWCA Civ 169 |
|
23 May 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |

1 Cites
1 Citers
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Robinsons': Application No 2180596 |
|
23 May 2000 TMRMs J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 May 2000 TMRMiss J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Robinsons (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o18300 |
|
23 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cartonneries De Thulin SA -v- Ctp White Knight Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 174 |
|
25 May 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Christopher Ronald Tasker -v- Raymond Wilson & Victor J Colley O/184/00 |
|
25 May 2000 DRMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Designs/Design Right Decisions - Designs |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Christopher Ronald Tasker -v- Raymond Wilson & Victor J Colley O/184/00 |
|
25 May 2000 DRMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Designs/Design Right Decisions - Designs |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Roadtech Computer Systems Ltd -v- Mandata (Management & Data Services) Ltd Unreported, 25 May 2000 |
|
25 May 2000 ChDBowman Master |
Intellectual Property |
|
| The parties were competitors in providing computer systems to road maintenance companies. The defendant had included the claimant's name in meta-tags on their web pages, and also in hidden text in the main pages, with the intent that those searching for the claimant would find their company instead. Held: The use of the mark was both infringement and passing off. |
| | |
| Christopher Ronald Tasker -v- Raymond Wilson & Victor J Colley - O/184/00 |
|
25 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Designs - Designs/Design Right Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Christopher Ronald Tasker -v- Raymond Wilson & Victor J Colley - O/184/00 |
|
25 May 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Designs - Designs/Design Right Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd -v- Marks and Spencer Plc [2000] EWCA Civ 179; [2001] Ch 257 |
|
26 May 2000 CALord Justice Mance Lord Justice Chadwick Lord Justice Peter Gibson |
Intellectual Property, Media |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The defendant had a cuttings service, and distributed selected articles amongst its staff. The Agency complained that this amounted to copying a substantial part of the editions from which the cuttings were taken. There was no typographical copyright infringed as the layout had changed, and the work referred to was the entire paper edition, and the question of what was a substantial part of the edition was a matter of impression. The statutory definition of a "published edition" meant that copyright could subsist in the typographical arrangement of the newspaper as a whole. |
| Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 30(2) |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Colin Rooney (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o18800 |
|
30 May 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Colin Rooney - Gb9522134 7 O/188/00; O/188/00 |
|
30 May 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
30 May 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Digital Edge (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o18600 |
|
1 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Edge': Application No 2051099 OPP 46843; OPP 46843 |
|
1 Jun 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: DIGITAL EDGE 2051099 |
|
1 Jun 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Gordon Stephen Ford -v- Southern Water Technologies (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o21500 |
|
6 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Parnas Cordon Blanco': Application No 2024149 -v- 2024193 -v- 2024195 OPP 46084 / 46085 / 46086; OPP 46084 / 46085 / 46086 |
|
6 Jun 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Parnas Cordon Blanco (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19200 |
|
6 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PARNAS CORDON BLANCO 2024149, 2024193, 2024195 |
|
6 Jun 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PARNAS CORDON BLANCHE 2024149, 2024193, 2024195 |
|
6 Jun 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Parnas Cordon Blanche (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19300 |
|
6 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Parnas Cordon Blanche': Application No 2024195 -v- 2024149 -v- 2024193 OPP 46035 / 46036 / 46037; OPP 46035 / 46036 / 46037 |
|
6 Jun 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Climate Master': Application No 2018635 OPP 49931; OPP 49931 |
|
8 Jun 2000 TMRMr J Parker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: CLIMATE MASTER 2018635 |
|
8 Jun 2000 TMRMr J Parker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Climate Master (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o22400 |
|
8 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Nordic': Application No 1374248 REV/INV; REV/INV |
|
12 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Evian': Application No 880971 REV 9761; REV 9761 |
|
12 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Laizas Marine Uk Limited -v- Norseman Gibb Limited - O/201/00 |
|
12 Jun 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Designs - Designs/Design Right Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nordic (Trade Mark: Inter Partes) [2000] UKIntelP o19100 |
|
12 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Laizas Marine UK Limited -v- Norseman Gibb Limited O/201/00; O/201/00 |
|
12 Jun 2000 DRMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Designs/Design Right Decisions - Designs |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Evian (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o19000 |
|
12 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Inter Partes. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| South Beach CafÉ (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19600 |
|
13 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Esquire': Application No 601990 REV 9441; REV 9441 |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| South Beach CafÉ (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19500 |
|
13 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Insight': Application No 1384713 OPP 47702; OPP 47702 |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'South Beach Café': Application No 2060355 OPP 46335; OPP 46335 |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'South Beach Café': Application No 2060358 OPP 46336; OPP 46336 |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SOUTH BEACH CAFÉ 2060358 |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Esquire (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o18900 |
|
13 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SOUTH BEACH CAFÉ 2060355 |
|
13 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Insight (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19400 |
|
13 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: CYCLING IS... 2115347 |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Digi (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o20000 |
|
14 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: (SHAPE) GLASS 2043589 |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMrs J Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rainforest (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19800 |
|
14 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cycling Is (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o19900 |
|
14 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Rainforest': Application No 2114552 OPP 48004; OPP 48004 |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Cycling Is ': Application No 2115347 OPP 47027; OPP 47027 |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Digi': Application No 1577042 OPP 48948; OPP 48948 |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| (Shape) Glass (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o20400 |
|
14 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '(Shape) Glass': Application No 2043589 |
|
14 Jun 2000 TMRMs J Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Tam (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o20200 |
|
15 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
15 Jun 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tam': Application No 2137892 OPP 49310; OPP 49310 |
|
15 Jun 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
15 Jun 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Colin Rooney - Gb9522134 7 O/188a/00; O/188a/00 |
|
15 Jun 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Trade Mark Consists of The Smell, Aroma, or Essence of Cinnamon (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o20300 |
|
16 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Masters Augusta Usa': Application No 1459735, 1459736, 1459917, 1459918 OPP 44618, 44616, 44647, 44615; OPP 44618, 44616, 44647, 44615 |
|
16 Jun 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Masters': Application No 2042251 OPP 45190; OPP 45190 |
|
16 Jun 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Masters Augusta Usa (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o20600 |
|
16 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: MASTERS AUGUSTA USA 1459735, 1459736, 1459917, 145 |
|
16 Jun 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE MASTERS 2042251 |
|
16 Jun 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Masters (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o20500 |
|
16 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE TRADE MARK CONSISTS OF THE SMELL, AROMA, OR ESSENCE OF CINNAMON 2000169 |
|
16 Jun 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Trade Mark Consists of the Smell, Aroma, Or Essence of Cinnamon': Application No 2000169 |
|
16 Jun 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
|
19 Jun 2000 TMRMr J Hamilton-Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Turbo (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o20800 |
|
19 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Turbo': Application No 2182428 |
|
19 Jun 2000 TMRJ Hamilton-Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Limited (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o26500 |
|
20 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Limited - Gb 9700759 5 O/265/00; O/265/00 |
|
20 Jun 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Limited - O/265/00 |
|
20 Jun 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 3Dnow! (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o21100 |
|
21 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Jun 2000 TMRMiss J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '3Dnow!': Application No 2180156 |
|
21 Jun 2000 TMRMs J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Smiley': Application No 2048360 OPP 45855 |
|
22 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o21200 |
|
22 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Device of A Smiling Face Series of Two (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o21300 |
|
22 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Mark: Device of a smiling face Series of Two 2048360 |
|
22 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Marca Mode CV -v- Adidas AG C-425/98; [2000] ETMR 723; [2000] 2 CMLR 1061; [2000] EUECJ C-425/98 |
|
22 Jun 2000 ECJ |
European, Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
The reputation of a trade mark does not give grounds for presuming a likelihood of confusion simply because of a likelihood of association in the strict sense.
Europa Article 5(1)(b) of First Directive 89/104 on trade marks cannot be interpreted as meaning that where - a trade mark has a particularly distinctive character, either per se or because of the reputation it enjoys with the public, and - a third party, without the consent of the proprietor of the mark, uses, in the course of trade in goods or services which are identical with, or similar to, those for which the trade mark is registered, a sign which so closely corresponds to the mark as to give rise to the possibility of its being associated with that mark, the exclusive right enjoyed by the proprietor entitles him to prevent the use of the sign by that third party if the distinctive character of the mark is such that the possibility of such association giving rise to confusion cannot be ruled out. The reputation of a mark does not give grounds for presuming the existence of a likelihood of confusion simply because of the existence of a likelihood of association in the strict sense. A positive finding of the existence of a likelihood of confusion, which constitutes the matter to be proved, is necessary. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Vermaat and Another -v- Boncrest Ltd |
|
22 Jun 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property |
|
| A drawing, which was otherwise an artistic work, did not cease to be protected by copyright, merely because it contained words and figures, as a direction on how to make up the article of craftsmanship depicted, and the article could not be made without those directions. It was necessary for the author to be both artist and craftsman. It might be an artistic work if it contained details necessary to create an artistic work. Copyright did not subsist in samples created to exemplify the drawings. |
| | |
| 'Device': Application No 2052417 OPP 47391; OPP 47391 |
|
22 Jun 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
22 Jun 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| John Richard Miles Turner -v- John Curran, Nigel Willis & & J R Miles Turner - O/187/00 |
|
26 Jun 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| John Richard Miles Turner -v- John Curran, Nigel Willis & & J R Miles Turner - Gb9913571 7 -v- Gb9914495 8 O/187/00 |
|
26 Jun 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clinical Product Development Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o21000 |
|
26 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clinical Product Development Limited - O/210/00 |
|
26 Jun 2000 POMr M Wright |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clinical Product Development Limited - Ep0580630 O/210/00; O/210/00 |
|
26 Jun 2000 POMr M Wright |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| John Richard Miles Turner -v- John Curran Nigel Willis (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o18700 |
|
26 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE MUSLIM PARLIAMENT OF GREAT BRITAIN 2189191 |
|
27 Jun 2000 TMRMs L Adams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '(Shape) Tablet': Application No 700785 |
|
27 Jun 2000 TMRMr I Peggie |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Can and Will': Application No 2182437A |
|
27 Jun 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Can and Will (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o21900 |
|
27 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Muslim Parliament of Great Britain (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o22000 |
|
27 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| (Shape) Tablet (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o21800 |
|
27 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: CAN AND WILL 2182437A |
|
27 Jun 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'The Muslim Parliament of Great Britain': Application No 2189191 OPP 50126 |
|
27 Jun 2000 TMRMs L Adams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: (SHAPE) TABLET 700785 |
|
27 Jun 2000 TMRMr I Peggie |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Espirit De Nature': Application No 1527496 OPP 43039; OPP 43039 |
|
28 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Nevamed (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o22100 |
|
28 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Nevamed': Application No 2100790 OPP 46148; OPP 46148 |
|
28 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
28 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Espirit De Nature (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o22200 |
|
28 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ESPIRIT DE NATURE 1527496 |
|
28 Jun 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Keahinuimakahahaikalani Howard Seymour -v- Coventry University - O/223/00 |
|
29 Jun 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| British Broadcasting Corporation -v- Talksport Ltd |
|
29 Jun 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property, Media |
|
| The tort of passing off depended upon there being some goodwill capable of being relied upon. Words which were merely descriptive of the service offered, such as 'live sports broadcasting,' were incapable of carrying any goodwill, and accordingly a service of broadcasting live commentary but based upon other broadcasts was not a passing off when describing itself as such. |
| | |
| Keahinuimakahahaikalani Howard Seymour -v- Coventry University - Gb9808874 3 O/223/00 |
|
29 Jun 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Keahinuimakahahaikalani Howard Seymour -v- Coventry University (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o22300 |
|
29 Jun 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Straight Shape (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o22500 |
|
3 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: STRAIGHT & SHAPE 708182 |
|
3 Jul 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Straight & Shape': Application No 708182 |
|
3 Jul 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Kenco, The Real Coffee Experts (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o23400 |
|
5 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: KENCO, THE REAL COFFEE EXPERTS 2025980 |
|
5 Jul 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
5 Jul 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cernivet (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o23100 |
|
5 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Cernivet': Application No 1228426 REV 9738; REV 9738 |
|
5 Jul 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Showercare (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o23300 |
|
5 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
5 Jul 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Showercare': Application No 2111756 INV 10042; INV 10042 |
|
5 Jul 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Kenco, the Real Coffee Experts': Application No 2025980 OPP 44117; OPP 44117 |
|
5 Jul 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'What Not Butter': Application No 2069656 OPP 45889; OPP 45889 |
|
6 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Juridical Foundation, The Chemo-Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute And Teijin Limited - O/232/00 |
|
6 Jul 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Juridical Foundation, the Chemo-Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute and Teijin Limited - Spc/Gb99/031 O/232/00; O/232/00 |
|
6 Jul 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Juridical Foundation, The Chemo -Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute and Teijin Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o23200 |
|
6 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: WHAT NOT BUTTER 2069656 |
|
6 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| What Not Butter (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o23500 |
|
6 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: TASTED & APPROVED 2158449 |
|
7 Jul 2000 TMRMr S P Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Tasted Approved (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o23600 |
|
7 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tasted & Approved': Application No 2158449 OPP 49328; OPP 49328 |
|
7 Jul 2000 TMRMr S Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| John Birtles & Colin Lovatt And Evode Limited -v- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company - O/237/00 |
|
10 Jul 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Birtles, Lovatt and Evode Ltd -v- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o23700 |
|
10 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mary E Read, Daniel D Haas And Thomas A Mackin -v- Eastman Kodak Limited - O/245/00 |
|
10 Jul 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| John Birtles & Colin Lovatt and Evode Limited -v- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company - Gb2282144 -v- Ep0638392 O/237/00 |
|
10 Jul 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Eastman Kodak Company (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o24500 |
|
10 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mary E Read, Daniel D Haas and Thomas A Mackin -v- Eastman Kodak Limited - Gb2300777 O/245/00; O/245/00 |
|
10 Jul 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
13 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Caremix (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o24400 |
|
13 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Caremix': Application No 2126884 OPP 47732; OPP 47732 |
|
13 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Raleigh International (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o25300 |
|
14 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Raleighinternational': Application No 2033472 OPP 46834; OPP 46834 |
|
14 Jul 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: RALEIGH INTERNATIONAL 2033472 |
|
14 Jul 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Every Idea Safely Delivered': Application No 2183690 |
|
17 Jul 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Every Idea Safely Delivered (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o27500 |
|
17 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Goldline (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o29900 |
|
17 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Torremar': Application No 2178911 OPP 49512 |
|
17 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
17 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
|
17 Jul 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Torremar (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o24700 |
|
17 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: EVERY IDEA SAFELY DELIVERED 2183690 |
|
17 Jul 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Skylift': Application No 2057163 REC/INV 10334; REC/INV 10334 |
|
19 Jul 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Rectification |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Skylift (Trade Mark: Rectification) [2000] UKIntelP o24900 |
|
19 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
19 Jul 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'South Beach Café': Application No 2060358 OPP 46336; OPP 46336 |
|
20 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| South Beach CafÉ (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o25000 |
|
20 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SOUTH BEACH CAFÉ 2060358 |
|
20 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc -v- Proctor and Gamble Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 74 |
|
21 Jul 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc -v- Procter & Gamble Ltd and Another [2000] EWHC 176 (Pat); [2001] FSR 22; (2000) 23(10) IPD 23087 |
|
21 Jul 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| United Wire Ltd -v- Screen Repair Services (Scotland) Ltd [2000] UKHL 42; [2000] 4 All ER 353 |
|
21 Jul 2000 HL |
Intellectual Property |
|
| Where the apparent exercise of a right of repair went in fact to the creation of a new product, then the patent underlying the mechanism was infringed. A business which operated on the basis of receiving in items for repair, but which then supplied refurbished and renewed items which need not be the original part returned, went beyond exercising a proper right of repair. |
| Patents Act 1977 60(1)(a) |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Royal Enfield Made Like A Bullet': Application No 2031741 -v- 1514064 OPP 45356 INV 9188 |
|
21 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ROYAL ENFIELD MADE LIKE A BULLET 1514064, 2031741 |
|
21 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Antiquesportfolio Com Plc -v- Rodney Fitch and Co Ltd |
|
21 Jul 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property |
|
| In a contract to supply designs, there was an implied obligation to carry out the design work with reasonable care and skill and to use reasonable care to ensure that the materials supplied were free of any adverse claim. Held: The breach arose not at the time when proceedings for infringement were begun, but when the duty not to copy was broken. A photograph of a static object was itself capable of founding a claim to copyright. The requirement of originality was satisfied 'by little more than the opportunistic pointing of a camera and the pressing of the shutter button.' |
| | |
| Royal Enfield Made Like A Bullet (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o25100 |
|
21 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Colourhold System': Application No 2183867 |
|
24 Jul 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pagoda (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o25400 |
|
24 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pagoda': Application No 523292 REV 9773; REV 9773 |
|
24 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Central Laboratories Ltd -v- Magill O/256/00; Pct/Gb92/02064 |
|
24 Jul 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Central Research Laboratories Ltd -v- Intelligent Clothing Ltd and Alan Magill (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o25600 |
|
24 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Central Laboratories Ltd -v- Magill O/256/00 |
|
24 Jul 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: COLOURHOLD SYSTEM 2183867 |
|
24 Jul 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
24 Jul 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Colourhold System (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o25500 |
|
24 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Blue Leaf (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o24800 |
|
25 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
25 Jul 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 'Blue Leaf': Application No 2205533 |
|
25 Jul 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Wheatley, Bortec Limited -v- Drillsafe Limited, Force Group Services Plc, Foster, Foster, Carter, Davies [2000] EWCA Civ 209; [2001] RPC 133 |
|
25 Jul 2000 CAAldous LJ, Sedley LJ, Mance LJ |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites

|
| In a claim for infringement of a patent, where variations on a patent were to be considered, the court should look to the three tests set down in Improver ('the Protocal questions'), and the claim should be interpreted in a purposive and contextual way. The court should ask if the variation was material, would the variation itself have been obvious, and would a skilled reader have understood that the patent claim required strict compliance with its primary meaning. |
| Patents Act 1977 - Protocol on the Interpretation of Article 69 of the European Patent Convention |
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Euromarket Designs Inc -v- Peters and Trade and Barrel Ltd [2001] FSR 288; [2000] IP & T 1290 |
|
25 Jul 2000 ChDJacobs J |
Intellectual Property |

1 Citers
|
| The court considered the nature of use in relation to goods under the 1994 Act, and the Directive: "It may well be that the concept of 'use in relation to goods' is different for differing purposes. Much may turn on the public conception of the use. For instance, if you buy Kodak film in Boots and it is put in a bag labelled 'Boots', only a trade mark lawyer might say that 'Boots' is being used as a trade mark for film. Mere physical proximity between sign and goods may not make the use of the sign in relation to the goods. Perception matters too." |
| Trade Marks Act 1994 |
| | |
|
26 Jul 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 'Autonet': Application No 2045372 INV 9914; INV 9914 |
|
26 Jul 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Autonet (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o25700 |
|
26 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Lionweld Kennedy Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o25800 |
|
27 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| American Home Products Corporation, Professor Roy Calne -v- Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited, Novartis Pharma AG [2000] EWCA Civ 231; [2001] RPC 159; [2001] FSR 784 |
|
27 Jul 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The invention was a second medical use for a known drug rapamycin, which was found to have an immuno-suppressive effect. The court asked whether a claim to rapamycin should be construed to include derivatives. Held: A person skilled in the art would be unable to say without experimentation that any particular derivative would have an immuno-suppressive effect. Applying the second Protocol question, it would have been absurd to ask whether, assuming that a derivative "worked" in the sense of having an immuno-suppressive effect, it worked "in the same way". That would really be to beg the question. Neither the product nor the process was new: the whole point of the invention was the newly discovered immuno-suppressive effect. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Lionweld Kennedy Limited - Gb9526008 9 O/258/00; O/258/00 |
|
27 Jul 2000 POMr M Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Lionweld Kennedy Limited - O/258/00 |
|
27 Jul 2000 POMr M Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
28 Jul 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Taste! (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o32500 |
|
28 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rohm & Haas Company -v- Collag Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 72 |
|
28 Jul 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company - Gb9610924 4 -v- Gb0005604 4 O/259/00 |
|
31 Jul 2000 POMr M Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Mark: DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES 2193296 |
|
31 Jul 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o25900 |
|
31 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Coflexip SA, Coflexip Stena Offshore Ltd -v- Stolt Comes Seaway MS Ltd, Stolt Comex Seaway Ltd, Stolt Comex Seaway SA [2001] RPC 182; [2000] EWCA Civ 242; [2000] IP & T 1332; [2000] IP&T 1332 |
|
31 Jul 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| Any injunction to restrain passing off will need to be carefully drafted so not to give relief beyond that justified by the findings. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company - O/259/00 |
|
31 Jul 2000 POMr M Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Diana, Princess of Wales (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o26100 |
|
31 Jul 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oxford Gene Technology Ltd and Affymetrix Inc; Affymetrix UK Ltd and Beckman Coulter Inc [2000] EWCA Civ 253 |
|
1 Aug 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Solex': Application No 1540074 OPP 41891; OPP 41891 |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Jet -Tek (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o26200 |
|
1 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Magic Ball (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o29700 |
|
1 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Philosophy': Application No 1335163 REV 9206; REV 9206 |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr S Thorley
Intellectual Property |
| |
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Super Coffee Mix (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o26000 |
|
1 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SUPER COFFEE MIX 2172992 |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Attfield |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Super Coffee Mix': Application No 2172992 |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Attfield |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Party Land (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o26300 |
|
1 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Philosophy (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o27600 |
|
1 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Solex (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o26400 |
|
1 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Party Land': Application No 2128767 OPP 47881; OPP 47881 |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Jet-Tek': Application No 2103811 OPP 46425; OPP 46425 |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRDr B Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Magic Ball': Application No 2100056 OPP 46130 |
|
1 Aug 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Take Control (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o26600 |
|
3 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Prima Nina (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o26800 |
|
3 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Prima Nina': Application No 651606 OPP 70004; OPP 70004 |
|
3 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: FUN TO LEARN 651606 |
|
3 Aug 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: TAKE CONTROL 2192145 |
|
3 Aug 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Fun To Learn': Application No 651606 |
|
3 Aug 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
3 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Fun To Learn (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o26700 |
|
3 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Take Control': Application No 2192145 |
|
3 Aug 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o26900 |
|
4 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Limited - Pct/Gb98/00136 O/269/00; O/269/00 |
|
4 Aug 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| James Richard Jackson -v- Carbury Herne Limited - O/269/00 |
|
4 Aug 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Zino Davidoff Sa -v- M & S Toiletries Limited [2000] ScotCS 220 |
|
8 Aug 2000 OHCSLord McCluskey |
Scotland, Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mokkers (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o27100 |
|
8 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
8 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
8 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Harrodian': Application No 1570095 OPP 43446; OPP 43446 |
|
8 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Mokkers': Application No 2134984 OPP 47807; OPP 47807 |
|
8 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Harrodian (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o27000 |
|
8 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Innovata Biomed Limited - Spc/Gb/99/018 O/274/00; O/274/00 |
|
10 Aug 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Innovata Biomed Limited - O/274/00 |
|
10 Aug 2000 POMr D Wood |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Innovata Biomed Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o27400 |
|
10 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
14 Aug 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Francis Vause (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o27800 |
|
14 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| H G Kaiser -v- A M Morgan and J B G Schmidt (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o27900 |
|
14 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Anthony Malcolm Morgan and John Bedford Gallienne Schmidt -v- Hans-Gerd Kaiser - Ep0329959 O/279/00 |
|
14 Aug 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Anthony Malcolm Morgan And John Bedford Gallienne Schmidt -v- Hans-Gerd Kaiser - O/279/00 |
|
14 Aug 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Francis Vause - Ep0571385 O/278/00; O/278/00 |
|
14 Aug 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
15 Aug 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Panacell': Application No 2048599 OPP 46229; OPP 46229 |
|
15 Aug 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Panacell (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o29100 |
|
15 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Michael Willis Peet (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o36000 |
|
16 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Michael Willis Peet - Gb9926835 1 O/360/00 |
|
16 Aug 2000 POMrs L Blunt |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Michael Willis Peet - O/360/00 |
|
16 Aug 2000 POMrs L Blunt |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Amplifiber (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30000 |
|
21 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Aug 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pebble Beach (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30100 |
|
21 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PEBBLE BEACH 2134358 |
|
21 Aug 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pro Sport': Application No 2028241 OPP 46602; OPP 46602 |
|
21 Aug 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Aug 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pebble Beach': Application No 2134358 OPP 48782; OPP 48782 |
|
21 Aug 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pro Sport (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30200 |
|
21 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Amplifiber': Application No 2041109 OPP 45245; OPP 45245 |
|
21 Aug 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Zoom': Application No 2117793 OPP 47004; OPP 47004 |
|
22 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Ley (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30600 |
|
22 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: MOBILE WAREHOUSE 2132908 |
|
22 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Zoom (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30500 |
|
22 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Mobile Warehouse': Application No 2132908 OPP 47753; OPP 47753 |
|
22 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mobile Warehouse (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30700 |
|
22 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Ley': Application No 2130218 OPP 47639; OPP 47639 |
|
22 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Global Domestic Products Limited and Stylianos Panaghe -v- Pifco Limited - Ep0485211 O/303/00; O/303/00 |
|
22 Aug 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Global Domestic Products Limited And Stylianos Panaghe -v- Pifco Limited - O/303/00 |
|
22 Aug 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
22 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
22 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Global Domestic Products Ltd and S Panagne -v- Pifco Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o30300 |
|
22 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Mcbain': Application No 2107264 OPP 47389; OPP 47389 |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Barmambo': Application No 2112584 OPP 47405; OPP 47405 |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Benz Boom Rock Soul and Device': Application No 2045659 OPP 45455; OPP 45455 |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Fujitsu Limited (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o31700 |
|
23 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Blue Bleu (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o31600 |
|
23 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Benz Boom Rock Soul and Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o31500 |
|
23 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Barmambo (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o31400 |
|
23 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Aug 2000 POMr P Marchant |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Blue Bleu': Application No 2185306 |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Layton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Planet Football': Application No 2125569 OPP 48142 |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Layton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: BENZ BOOM ROCK SOUL AND DEVICE 2045659 |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Fujitsu Limted O/317/00; Gb9604003 5 |
|
23 Aug 2000 POMr P Marchant |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mcbain (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30800 |
|
23 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PLANET FOOTBALL 2125569 |
|
23 Aug 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Planet Football (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30900 |
|
23 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: IPRATROPIOVENT 2002897 |
|
24 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Sarantos': Application No 2175746 OPP 49506; OPP 49506 |
|
24 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
24 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Ipratropiovent': Application No 2002897 INV 10595; INV 10595 |
|
24 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Sarantos (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o32000 |
|
24 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ipratropiovent (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o31900 |
|
24 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Mer': Application No 2137465A OPP 48541; OPP 48541 |
|
28 Aug 2000 TMRMr R Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mer (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o32400 |
|
28 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
28 Aug 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
29 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Sergio (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o32100 |
|
29 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Sergio': Application No 2112252 OPP 49004 |
|
29 Aug 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
30 Aug 2000 TMRMiss J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
30 Aug 2000 TMRMiss J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Orange (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o32700 |
|
30 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Orange': Application No 2108404A |
|
30 Aug 2000 TMRMs J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Orange': Application No 2108402A |
|
30 Aug 2000 TMRMs J Folwell |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Orange (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o32600 |
|
30 Aug 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Gatehouse Theatre': Application No 2142905 OPP 48359; OPP 48359 |
|
1 Sep 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE GATEHOUSE THEATRE 2142905 |
|
1 Sep 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Gatehouse Theatre (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o32800 |
|
1 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pebble Beach (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o33000 |
|
5 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'T Mobilnet ': Application No 2028440 OPP 48063; OPP 48063 |
|
5 Sep 2000 TMRMr J Parker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| T Mobilnet (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o32900 |
|
5 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PEBBLE BEACH 2134358 |
|
5 Sep 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pebble Beach': Application No 2134358 OPP 48782; OPP 48782 |
|
5 Sep 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: T. MOBILNET. 2028440 |
|
5 Sep 2000 TMRMr J Parker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Kangol (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o33800 |
|
6 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Kangol': Application No 2104167 INV 10027; INV 10027 |
|
6 Sep 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Kimberley-Clark Worldwide Inc -v- Procter and Gamble Ltd and Another |
|
6 Sep 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property |
|
| A patent claim should not be considered covetous without evidence that the claim was in some way blameworthy. Courts must be careful when judging claims with hindsight, and where different national standards had been involved. A claim to amend a patent drafted in the US for grant in the European Patent Office by a German firm of patent agents without reference to UK practice. Blameworthy in this sense meant drafting a claim including material which the attorney knew to be old. |
| | |
|
6 Sep 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '10 Royal Berkshire Polo Club': Application No 2029454 OPP 45152; OPP 45152 |
|
7 Sep 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '(Shape) Cigarette Packet': Application No 2031898 & 2031899 |
|
7 Sep 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 10 Royal Berkshire Polo Club (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o33500 |
|
7 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| (Shape) Cigarette Packet (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o33400 |
|
7 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bestplate Limited -v- Sandhurst Autoprint Limited O/333/00; GB2322466 |
|
7 Sep 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bestplate Ltd -v- Sandhurst Autoprint Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o33300 |
|
7 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bestplate Limited -v- Sandhurst Autoprint Limited O/333/00 |
|
7 Sep 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: (SHAPE) CIGARETTE PACKET 2031898, 2031899 |
|
7 Sep 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: 10 ROYAL BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB 2029454 |
|
7 Sep 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
11 Sep 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
11 Sep 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Cableco': Application No 2142193 OPP 48632; OPP 48632 |
|
11 Sep 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cableco (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o33600 |
|
11 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Frosties': Application No 2000323 OPP 48926; OPP 48926 |
|
11 Sep 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Frosties (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o33700 |
|
11 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Planet Football (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o34100 |
|
15 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Planet Football': Application No 2125569 OPP 48142 |
|
15 Sep 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PLANET FOOTBALL 2125569 |
|
15 Sep 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
20 Sep 2000 TMRMr C Hamilton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| David Page (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o34600 |
|
20 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Recovery': Application No 2186014 |
|
20 Sep 2000 TMRMr C Hamilton |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Recovery (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o35000 |
|
20 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: DAVID PAGE 2117243A, 2117243B |
|
20 Sep 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Hot Herbal Digestive Tea the Natural Aid To Digestion': Application No 2032730 INV 9937; INV 9937 |
|
20 Sep 2000 TMRMr R Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'David Page': Application No 2117243A & 2117243B OPP 47998 & 48071; OPP 47998 & 48071 |
|
20 Sep 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: HOT HERBAL DIGESTIVE TEA THE NATURAL AID TO DIGESTION 2032730 |
|
20 Sep 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Hot Herbal Digestive Tea The Natural Aid To Digestion (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o34500 |
|
20 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Sep 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tod's: Application No 1501029 & 1501030 OPP 45822; OPP 45820 |
|
21 Sep 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tod's': Application No 2100208 OPP 46215 |
|
21 Sep 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Tod'S (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o35100 |
|
21 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Tod'S (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o35200 |
|
21 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: TOD'S 1501029, 1501030 |
|
21 Sep 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Loaded (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o45500 |
|
22 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Loaded': Application No 2061604 OPP 45580; OPP 45580 |
|
22 Sep 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
22 Sep 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Valucci Designs Ltd -v- IPC Magazines BL 0-455-00 |
|
22 Sep 2000 Mr Simon Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| The parties disputed the validity of registrations of Trade Marks for the word 'Loaded'. Held: This was a case of 'non-confusing' uses. |
| | |
| Francis Vause (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o35900 |
|
28 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
28 Sep 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Techmedia (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o45600 |
|
28 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Scott Leathers (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o36100 |
|
29 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Central Research Laboratories Ltd -v- Intelligent Clothing Ltd and Alan Magill (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o36200 |
|
29 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: (SHAPE) TABLET 708442 |
|
29 Sep 2000 TMRMrs A Pritchard |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
|
29 Sep 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Francis Vause - Ep0571385 O/359/00 |
|
29 Sep 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Mark: SCOTT LEATHERS 1574071 |
|
29 Sep 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 'Scott Leathers': Application No 1574071 OPP 43409 |
|
29 Sep 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Central Research Laborartories Ltd -v- Alan Remy Magéll - Pct/Gb92/02064 O/362/00 |
|
29 Sep 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| (Shape) Tablet (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o32200 |
|
29 Sep 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '(Shape) Tablet': Application No 708442 |
|
29 Sep 2000 TMRMs A Pritchard |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Central Research Laborartories Ltd -v- Magill O/362/00 |
|
29 Sep 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ludlow Music Inc -v- Williams and others [2000] EWHC 456 (Ch); [2001] EMLR 7; [2001] FSR 19 |
|
2 Oct 2000 ChDN Strauss QC |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The claimant sought damages for copyright infringement in respect of two works which parodied a song to which they owned the rights. Held: The amount copied, being as much as a quarter of the original work, meant that the claim was indefensible. When considering the grant of an injunction "the right approach is to start with a strong bias in favour of granting an injunction, to be dispelled only if the circumstances of the case clearly make it unjust to do so." This was such an exceptional case. There had been acquiescence, and the claimants were interested only in the financial and not the artistic values. An injunction was refused and an enquiry as to damages ordered. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Barry Richardson - Gb9710345 1 O/368/00 |
|
3 Oct 2000 POMr B Westerman |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Barry Richardson (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o36800 |
|
3 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Barry Richardson O/368/00 |
|
3 Oct 2000 POMr B Westerman |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Dyson Appliances Ltd -v- Hoover Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 62; [2001] RPC 26 |
|
3 Oct 2000 PatCFysh QC |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap

1 Citers
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Central Research Laboratories Ltd - Gb0019352 4 O/419/00 |
|
4 Oct 2000 POMrs J Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Central Research Laboratories Ltd - O/419/00 |
|
4 Oct 2000 POMrs J Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Central Research Laboratories Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o41900 |
|
4 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Nonogram (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o36700 |
|
4 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Nonogram': Application No 2038995 OPP 45298 |
|
4 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
4 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| A Fulton Company Ltd. -v- Grant Barnett & Company Ltd. [2000] EWCA Civ 513; [2001] RPC 16 |
|
5 Oct 2000 CAPark J |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 213 - egistered Designs Act 1949 |
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Old Bike Mart (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o37000 |
|
5 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: OLD BIKE MART 2167183 |
|
5 Oct 2000 TMRMr E S Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Old Bike Mart': Application No 2167183 OPP 50104; OPP 50104 |
|
5 Oct 2000 TMRMr E Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| 'Codas': Application No 2023701 OPP 46224; OPP 46224 |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Itr': Application No 1050942 REV 11061; REV 11061 |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Itr': Application No 1066785 REV 11060; REV 11060 |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Itr': Application No 1066783 REV 11062; REV 11062 |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Itr (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o37300 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Itr (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o37500 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Itr (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o37400 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o37700 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o37600 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Rectification) [2000] UKIntelP o37900 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Device (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o37800 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Codas (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o37200 |
|
6 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Mark: DEVICE 1226399, 2137569 |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Rectification. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 'Device': Application No 2013437 REC 10436; REC 10436 |
|
6 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Rectification |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Muslim Parliament of Great Britain (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o48100 |
|
9 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'The Muslim Parliament of Great Britain': Application No 2189191 OPP 50126 |
|
9 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: THE MUSLIM PARLIAMENT OF GREAT BRITAIN 2189191 |
|
9 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Titan': Application No 2176611 OPP Null; OPP Null |
|
10 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Logical (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o38200 |
|
10 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oracle (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o38000 |
|
10 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ranco Incorporated (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o38400 |
|
10 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Titan (Trade Mark: Inter Partes) [2000] UKIntelP o38300 |
|
10 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Oracle': Application No 2129922 OPP 48605 |
|
10 Oct 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ranco Incorporated - O/384/00 |
|
10 Oct 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Logical': Application No 2021563 OPP 50947; OPP 50947 |
|
10 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ranco Incorporated - Ep0105256 O/384/00; O/384/00 |
|
10 Oct 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Oct 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Oct 2000 TMRMr S P Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Inter Partes. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: TONALITE HENNE 2040748 |
|
11 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Tonalite Henne': Application No 2040748 OPP 45587 |
|
11 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley
Intellectual Property |
| |
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Tonalite Henne (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o48500 |
|
11 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Baywatch (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o48600 |
|
12 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
12 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Baywatch': Application No 2026436 OPP 44755 |
|
12 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley
Intellectual Property |
| |
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Sony United Kingdom Limited (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o38800 |
|
12 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Sony United Kingdom Limited - O/388/00 |
|
12 Oct 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Sony United Kingdom Limited - Gb9624673 1 -v- Gb9624674 9 O/388/00; O/388/00 |
|
12 Oct 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| '3D Round Tablet': Application No 700785 |
|
13 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
13 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Aarp': Application No 2023113 OPP 46279 |
|
13 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 3D Round Tablet (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o48200 |
|
13 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Aarp (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o38700 |
|
13 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: 3D ROUND TABLET 700785 |
|
13 Oct 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: CAN AND WILL 2182437A |
|
14 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Can and Will (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o48400 |
|
14 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Can and Will': Application No 2182437A |
|
14 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley
Intellectual Property |
| |
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
15 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Blue Leaf': Application No 2205533 |
|
15 Oct 2000 TMRMr S Thorley
Intellectual Property |
| |
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Blue Leaf (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o48700 |
|
15 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: BAT OUT OF HELL 2024326 |
|
16 Oct 2000 TMRMrs J Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Jeffrey Ian Ayres - O/389/00 |
|
16 Oct 2000 POMrs J Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| 'Bat Out of Hell': Application No 2024326 OPP 44821; OPP 44821 |
|
16 Oct 2000 TMRMrs J Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bat Out of Hell (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o39000 |
|
16 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Jeffrey Ian Ayres - Gb9615577 5 O/389/00 |
|
16 Oct 2000 POMrs J Wilson |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Jeffrey Ian Ayres (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o38900 |
|
16 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Inn On The Green (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o39100 |
|
17 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Inn on the Green': Application No 2138251 OPP 49886; OPP 49886 |
|
17 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Premier Luggage and Bags Ltd -v- Premier Company (Uk) Ltd and Another |
|
17 Oct 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| The word 'Premier' although devoid of distinctive character in itself, but having been registered as a trade mark, had acquired a sufficient distinctiveness to justify and found an action for infringement and passing off. The test was whether through use of the trademark, a sufficient number both of potential purchasers of the claimants goods, and also of actual purchasers had come to associate goods with the claimant because of the trade mark. |
| Trade Marks Act 1994 3(1) |
| | |
| Mark: THE INN ON THE GREEN 2138251 |
|
17 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 'Device Only Mark (Monkey)': Application No 2070392 OPP 47392; OPP 47392 |
|
18 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PETER. J. GERBER OPTICIANS LTD 2199452 |
|
18 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: DEVICE ONLY MARK (MONKEY) 2070392 |
|
18 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Peter J Gerber Opticians Ltd': Application No 2199452 OPP 50363; OPP 50363 |
|
18 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Device Only Mark (Monkey) (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o38100 |
|
18 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Peter J Gerber Opticians Ltd (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o39200 |
|
18 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
23 Oct 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Ivana': Application No 2024168 INV 9536; INV 9536 |
|
23 Oct 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ivana (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o39300 |
|
23 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
|
25 Oct 2000 POMr G Rogers |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| David Evans - Gb9804563 6 O/395/00; O/395/00 |
|
25 Oct 2000 POMr G Rogers |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| British Airways Plc -v- Ryanair Limited [2001] FSR 32; [2000] EWHC Ch 55 |
|
25 Oct 2000 ChDJacob J |
Intellectual Property, Media, Torts - Other |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The claimant alleged that disparaging adverts by the defendant infringed its trade marks and amounted to the tort of malicious falsehood. Held: There was no dispute that the mark had been used. The Act could not be used to prevent any use of another's trade mark in comparitive advertising. In this case the advertisement, though possibly ambiguous was not misleading: "the use was honest comparative advertising. I suspect the real reason BA do not like it is precisely because it is true." |
| Trade Marks Act 10(6) - Comparative Advertising Directive of 6th October 1997 (97/55/EEC) |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| David Evans (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o39500 |
|
25 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| City Technology Ltd -v- Alphasense Ltd [2000] EWHC Patents 56 |
|
25 Oct 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Party Land (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o39400 |
|
25 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
25 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Party Land': Application No 2128767 OPP 47881; OPP 47881 |
|
25 Oct 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Hiwatt': Application No 2043866 OPP 46654; OPP 46654 |
|
25 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
25 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| Hiwatt (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o39600 |
|
25 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Cafe Mambo (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o39700 |
|
26 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: CAFE MAMBO 2116249B |
|
26 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
26 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Dhillon'S': Application No 2051141B OPP 46113; OPP 46113 |
|
26 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Cafe Mambo': Application No 2116249B OPP 47472; OPP 47472 |
|
26 Oct 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Dhillon'S (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o39800 |
|
26 Oct 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Jones -v- Tower Hamlets London Borough Council and Another |
|
26 Oct 2000 ChD |
Intellectual Property, Construction |
|
| The architect drew plans for buildings on a development completion of which was taken over by the council. The architect claimed breach of copyright in his plans. The expression of design ideas in an architectural drawing was capable of protection by copyright. An architect might see the plans drawn by another, absorb some of the ideas, and then re-express the ideas in his own way. He may not copy them. The line between them is a fine one. Was the new design a copy of the style or idea or of the expression of the style or idea. One is acceptable, the other is not. The degree of similarity, and method of preparation of the second article were important. |
| Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 |
| | |
| Pinmore (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o40600 |
|
1 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pinmore': Application No 2127969 OPP 47718; OPP 47718 |
|
1 Nov 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Nov 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Affymetrix Inc; Affymetrix UK Ltd and Beckman Coulter Inc [2000] EWCA Civ 272 |
|
2 Nov 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Wannabee': Application No 2057858 OPP 46024; OPP 46024 |
|
6 Nov 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Fss': Application No 2028150 OPP 44658; OPP 44658 |
|
6 Nov 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Nov 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Re Promotion Services Ltd -v- Werner Kotzab - O/411/00 |
|
6 Nov 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Nov 2000 TMRMr Geoffrey Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Winbacs': Application No 2027044 INV 9798; INV 9798 |
|
6 Nov 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Re Promotion Services Ltd -v- Werner Kotzab - Gb2276017 O/411/00; O/411/00 |
|
6 Nov 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Agnes Mcgriskin - O/410/00 |
|
6 Nov 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Agnes Mcgriskin - Gb2291342 O/410/00 |
|
6 Nov 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Andrew Webb -v- Sandra Agnes Mcgriskin (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o41000 |
|
6 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
|
6 Nov 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| R E Promotion Services Ltd -v- Werner Kotzab (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o41100 |
|
6 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Fss (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o47300 |
|
6 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Winbacs (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o40700 |
|
6 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Wannabee (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o47100 |
|
6 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'You'D Better Believe It': Application No 1559983 INV 9304; INV 9304 |
|
7 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: "YOU'D BUTTER BELIEVE IT" 2020424 |
|
7 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clear Focus Imaging Inc -v- Contra Vision Limited - Gb2165292 O/412/00 |
|
7 Nov 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'You'd Butter Believe It': Application No 2020424 OPP 45888; OPP 45888 |
|
7 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: YOU'D BETTER BELIEVE IT 1559983 |
|
7 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Clear Focus Imaging Inc -v- Contra Vision Limited - O/412/00 |
|
7 Nov 2000 POMr S Dennehey |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| You'D Better Believe It (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o40900 |
|
7 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| You'D Butter Believe It (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o40800 |
|
7 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Matelect Limited - O/458/00 |
|
7 Nov 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patent Office - Ex Parte Decisions |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Contra Vision Ltd -v- Clear Focus Imaging Inc (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o41200 |
|
7 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Lilly Icos Llc -v- Pfizer Limited [2000] EWHC Patents 49 |
|
8 Nov 2000 PatCLaddie |
Intellectual Property |
|
| The claimant sought revocation of the defendant's patent for Viagra on the grounds of obviousness, and lack of novelty. Held: Patent specifications have to be read and construed through the eyes of a person skilled in the art who is assumed to be possessed of the common general knowledge of such a person. Though the lack of novelty claim failed, the matter covered was obvious in the light of earlier publications, and the patent was revoked. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
10 Nov 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Panacell (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o41300 |
|
10 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Panacell': Application No 2048599 OPP 46229; OPP 46229 |
|
10 Nov 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SOLDAPRO ORACLE 2163445A |
|
13 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Fresh Confidence': Application No 2201461A |
|
13 Nov 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Soldapro Oracle (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o41500 |
|
13 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Fresh Confidence (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o41400 |
|
13 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Soldapro Oracle': Application No 2163445A OPP 49571 |
|
13 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: FRESH CONFIDENCE 2201461A |
|
13 Nov 2000 TMRMr A Pike |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Reef (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o41800 |
|
14 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Relay (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o41600 |
|
14 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Relay (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o41700 |
|
14 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Relay': Application No 2010307 OPP 44312; OPP 44312 |
|
14 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Reef': Application No 2050662 OPP 46380; OPP 46380 |
|
14 Nov 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Relay': Application No 1545994 OPP 47839; OPP 47839 |
|
14 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
14 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
14 Nov 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
14 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oral-B Laboratories -v- Wisdom [2000] EWCA Civ 288 |
|
15 Nov 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Leo Rossi': Application No 2157558 OPP 48768; OPP 48768 |
|
20 Nov 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
20 Nov 2000 TMRMr C Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Finest': Application No 2198020 |
|
20 Nov 2000 TMRMr Bowen |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
20 Nov 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Leo Rossi (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o42100 |
|
20 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Finest (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o42000 |
|
20 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Jini (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o42500 |
|
21 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Jini': Application No 2187037 OPP 50304; OPP 50304 |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr S Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Lambrini (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o42400 |
|
21 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Psorimed (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o42200 |
|
21 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Motorail (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o42600 |
|
21 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Motorail': Application No 2185496 OPP 49882; OPP 49882 |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr R Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Lambrini': Application No 2147650 OPP 49031; OPP 49031 |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club': Application No 2106096 -v- 2119787 OPP 47378 / 47140; OPP 47378 / 47140 |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Psorimed': Application No 701332 OPP 70140; OPP 70140 |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o42300 |
|
21 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB 2106096, 2119787 |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr S P Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
21 Nov 2000 TMRMr R A Jones |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| F1 Grand Prix Cafe (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o42700 |
|
22 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: F1 GRAND PRIX CAFE 2053902 |
|
22 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'F1 Grand Prix Cafe': Application No 2053902 OPP 47490; OPP 47490 |
|
22 Nov 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Phonographic Performance Ltd -v- South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council [2000] EWHC 455 (Ch); [2001] 1 WLR 400; [2001] EMLR 446; [2001] RPC 594 |
|
23 Nov 2000 ChDNeuberger J |
Intellectual Property, Local Government, Charity |
|
| Local authorities ran classes in which aerobics teachers used music for lessons. No licence was obtained for the performance of the music. They claimed to be "a club, society or other organisation the main objects of which were charitable or otherwise concerned with the advancement of religion, education or social welfare." In effect this was a claim that a local government was a charity. Held: The defence could not succeed. The functions of a local authority would not normally be considered charitable. In this context, ‘social welfare’ was an inappropriate expression to describe such activities. Similarly the term ‘organisation’ in the Act, in this particular phrase, was to be read ejusdem generis with the words ‘club’ and ‘society’. It could not apply to a local authority. The function of a local authority is to carry out the administrative and governmental functions, in respect of its area. The legislature had thought it right to devolve those functions from national government. Those functions might include social welfare, but that was not its main purpose. |
| Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 67 |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oxford Gene Technology Ltd -v- Affymetrix Inc [2000] EWCA Civ 519; [2001] RPC 310; [2001] IP&T 307; [2001] RPC 18 |
|
23 Nov 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Bat Out of Hell': Application No 2024326 OPP 44821; OPP 44821 |
|
27 Nov 2000 TMRMrs J Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Carflow Products (Uk) Limited -v- Autoaccessori Farad Srl - O/006/01 |
|
27 Nov 2000 POMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Designs - Designs/Design Right Decisions - |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: BAT OUT OF HELL 2024326 |
|
27 Nov 2000 TMRMrs J Smith |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Carflow Products (Uk) Limited -v- Autoaccessori Farad Srl O/006/01 |
|
27 Nov 2000 DRMr P Hayward |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Designs/Design Right Decisions - Designs |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Bat Out of Hell (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o44800 |
|
27 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Designers Guild Ltd -v- Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (Trading As Washington DC) [2000] UKHL 58; [2001] 1 All ER 700; [2000] 1 WLR 2416; [2001] FSR 113 |
|
28 Nov 2000 HLLord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Hoffmann Lord Hope of Craighead Lord Millett Lord Scott of Foscote |
Litigation Practice, Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
The claimant sought to enforce its copyright in artwork for a fabric design Ixia, saying the defendant's design Marguerite infringed that copyright. Two issues faced the House. Just what had been copied and if any, then did this amount amount to the whole or a substantial part the design. Held: Where a court of first instance considered a claim of breach of copyright, it must consider both the question of whether copying had taken place, and if so whether what had been copied was substantial. An appellate court should recognise that both are questions of fact and degree, and should be very careful not to usurp the function of the court of first instance by reversing such a decision on appeal. Claims for infringement of artistic copyright differ from other infringement cases in that the result of infringement might or might not look like the original, and the fact of copying was more important. The line was very difficult to draw. Although in this case not the smallest part of a fabric design had been reproduced with anything approaching photographic fidelity, the copying of certain of the ideas expressed in that design which, in their conjoined expression, had involved original artistic skill and labour, constituted the copying of a substantial part of the artistic work.
Lord Hoffmann: "Generally speaking, in cases of artistic copyright, the more abstract and simple the copied idea, the less likely it is to constitute a substantial part. Originality, in the sense of the contribution of the author's skill and labour, tends to lie in the detail with which the basic idea is presented. Copyright law protects foxes better than hedgehogs. " |
| Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 16(3) |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oakwood Laboratories L L C -v- Syntex (Usa) Inc - Ep0052510 O/441/00; O/441/00 |
|
28 Nov 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oakwood Laboratories L L C -v- Syntex (Usa) Inc - O/441/00 |
|
28 Nov 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Oakwood Laboratories Llc -v- Syntex (Usa) Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o44100 |
|
28 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Gary J Capone Charles W Emerson -v- Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd Solutia Inc (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o44000 |
|
28 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Gary J Capone & Charles W Emerson -v- Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd & Solutia Inc - Gb2339717 O/440/00 |
|
28 Nov 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Gary J Capone & Charles W Emerson -v- Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd & Solutia Inc - O/440/00 |
|
28 Nov 2000 POMrs S Williams |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Collag Corporation, Collag Ltd -v- Merch & Co Inc CH 1998 C 3129 |
|
29 Nov 2000 PatCMr Justice Pumfrey |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| | |
| Lincoln (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2000] UKIntelP o44200 |
|
29 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr S P Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: EVERY IDEA SAFELY DELIVERED THE ULTIMATE CAR COLLECTION THE ULTIMATE CAR COLLECTION 2183690, 2200534 |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr S Thorley QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Appointed Person. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr S P Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr R Evans |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Ex Parte. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Pinmore (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o44300 |
|
29 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Plant -Tech (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o44500 |
|
29 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Lincoln': Application No 2165052 |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr R Evans |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the Ultimate Car Collection': Application No 2200534 |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMrs A Cheseman |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Ex Parte Decisions - Trade Marks |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Plantex': Application No 1399367 REV 10382; REV 10382 |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr S Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Plant-Tech': Application No 2138247 OPP 48551; OPP 48551 |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr S Rowan |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Pinmore': Application No 2127969 OPP 47718; OPP 47718 |
|
29 Nov 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The Ultimate Car Collection (Trade Mark: Appointed Person) [2000] UKIntelP o48000 |
|
29 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Plantex (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o44600 |
|
29 Nov 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Vitasorb (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2000] UKIntelP o45100 |
|
1 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Professional Solutions (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o44900 |
|
1 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| The End (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o45000 |
|
1 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Revocation. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'the End': Application No 2017278 INV 9701; INV 9701 |
|
1 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Vitasorb': Application No 1372130 REV 10159; REV 10159 |
|
1 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Revocation |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS 2009211 |
|
1 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
1 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Professional Solutions': Application No 2009211 OPP 46526; OPP 46526 |
|
1 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Birtles, Lovatt Evode Ltd -v- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o45200 |
|
4 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| John Birtles & Colin Lovatt and Evode Limited -v- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company - Gb2282144 -v- Ep0638392 O/452/00 |
|
4 Dec 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Patents |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| John Birtles & Colin Lovatt And Evode Limited -v- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company - O/452/00 |
|
4 Dec 2000 POMr G Bridges |
Intellectual Property |
|
| PO Patents - Inter Partes Decisions |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Firo': Application No 2010919 OPP 44576; OPP 44576 |
|
5 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Firo (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o45300 |
|
5 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| Oxford Gene Technology Ltd -v- Affymetrix Inc and Another |
|
5 Dec 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property, Litigation Practice |
|
| In the course of a challenge to a patent, the patentee sought to amend the patent. Held: He was not obliged when doing so to disclose documents in a manner which would allow their use on a wider basis than for the consideration of the amendment application. Revealing such documents beyond what was required to show the good faith of the assertion of privilege would lead to the loss of that privilege abroad. There was no obligation in modern litigation on a patentee to waive privilege in respect of all such documents. The decision whether to waive privilege was the patentee's, and the court's job was then to decide whether in fact privilege is waived. |
| | |
|
5 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Globerisk (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o45400 |
|
6 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
6 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Globerisk': Application No 2131903 OPP 47825; OPP 47825 |
|
6 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Foley |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Matelect Ltd (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o45800 |
|
7 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Matelect Limited - Ep0426753 O/458/00; O/458/00 |
|
7 Dec 2000 POMr R Walker |
Intellectual Property |
|
cw Ex Parte Decisions - Patents
po The proprietor (Matelect) was the original applicant for the EP patent, but had assigned the rights to another company during the application process. Some time after grant, the rights were re-assigned to Matelect and the patent agent who dealt with the re-assignment promised to send them a reminder regarding the next renewal fee payment. The agent did not do so explicitly, but nevertheless wrote to Matelect issuing a general reminder that renewal fees are payable annually. The agent also asked if he should inform the Office of a change in the address for service. On receiving no reply, the agent wrote another three times to Matelect asking whether renewal fees should be paid and if he was to be the address for service. Although Matelect replied concerning other matters in these letters, no instructions were received regarding address for service or The Office’s standard warning letter about overdue renewal fees was therefore not received by Matelect or their agents. Despite the letters from their agent asking for instructions, Matelect had assumed that they would in any case receive the promised reminder from their agent. This was held not to be taking reasonable care in giving instructions and making arrangements for renewing the patent and so the patent was not restored. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
8 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| [ IPO ] |
| | |
| 'Space': Application No 2109079 OPP 48223; OPP 48223 |
|
8 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Space (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o45700 |
|
8 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
11 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Ewc (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o45900 |
|
11 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Ewc': Application No 2181152 OPP 49693; OPP 49693 |
|
11 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'American Intercontinental University': Application No 2171448 OPP 49919; OPP 49919 |
|
12 Dec 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| American Intercontinental University (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o46000 |
|
12 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: AMERICAN INTERCONTINENTAL UNIVERSITY 2171448 |
|
12 Dec 2000 TMRMr A James |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Parfums Christian Dior -v- Tuk Consultancy BV C-392/98; [2000] EUECJ C-392/98 |
|
14 Dec 2000 ECJ |
Intellectual Property, European |
Casemap
1 Citers
|
| ECJ (External Relations) Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation - TRIPs Agreement - Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) - Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice - Article 50 of the TRIPs Agreement - Provisional measures - Interpretation - Direct effect. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Daimler Chysler AG -v- Javid Alavi (t/a Merc) [2000] EWHC Ch 37; [2001] RPC 42 |
|
18 Dec 2000 ChDPumfrey J |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| Where a trader was involved in an activity quite outside any activity which might be undertaken by the holder of the registered trade mark, and there was no real likelihood of confusion, the owner of the mark could not claim that the value of his own mark would be diminished or damaged caused to its reputation by the additional use. There was no evidence that the use of the name 'Merc' by the defendants who were selling clothing had been confused with goods of the claimant. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Synergie Travail Temporaire': Application No 2068197 OPP 48841; OPP 48841 |
|
19 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: SYNERGIE TRAVAIL TEMPORAIRE 2068197 |
|
19 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Miscellaneous Only (Smell Mark)': Application No 2000169 |
|
19 Dec 2000 TMRMr G Hobbs QC |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions - Trade Marks - |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Synergie Travail Temporaire (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o46900 |
|
19 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
| 'Wallet': Application No 1465967 -v- 1465968 OPP43920 / 43921; OPP43920 / 43921 |
|
20 Dec 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Peptac (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o47600 |
|
20 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
20 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Wallet (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o47400 |
|
20 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Peptac': Application No 2121905 OPP 47861; OPP 47861 |
|
20 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Knight |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
|
20 Dec 2000 TMRMr G Rose'Meyer |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Glenmoy (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o47500 |
|
20 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: WALLET 1465967, 1465968 |
|
20 Dec 2000 TMRMr G Salthouse |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Rocky Mountain Traders Limited and Hewlett Packard Gmbh; Westcoast Limited and Fellowes Manufacturing (UK) Limited [2000] EWCA Civ 347 |
|
20 Dec 2000 CA |
Intellectual Property |
Casemap
1 Cites
|
| The claimant appealed an order finding its patents for mechanisms for labelling CDs invalid for obviousness. Held: the judge had applied the correct tests for obviousness, and the view taken by the judge of the expert evidence was not open to challenge in the way suggested. The patent was invalid for obviousness, and the appeal failed. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Glenmoy': Application No 1579872 INV 9676; INV 9676 |
|
20 Dec 2000 TMRMr G Rose'Meyer |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Vitaliano Pancaldi (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o47700 |
|
21 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Novo Nordisk A/S -v- DSM NV; DSM NV's Patent [2000] EWHC Patents 34; [2001] RPC 25 |
|
21 Dec 2000 PatC |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Prolonid (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o47800 |
|
21 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
| | |
|
21 Dec 2000 TMRDr W J Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Invalidity. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Mark: VITALIANO PANCALDI 1448303 |
|
21 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Vitaliano Pancaldi': Application No 1448303 OPP 40002; OPP 40002 |
|
21 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| Douglas, Zeta Jones, Northern & Shell Plc -v- Hello! Limited (No 1) [2000] EWCA Civ 353; [2001] QB 967; [2001] 2 WLR 992; [2001] EMLR 9; [2001] FSR 40; [2001] 1 FLR 982; 9 BHRC 543; [2001] UKHRR 223; [2001] HRLR 26; [2001] 2 All ER 289; [2002] 1 FCR 289 |
|
21 Dec 2000 CABrooke, Sedley Keene LJJ |
Intellectual Property, Human Rights, Media |
Casemap
1 Cites
1 Citers
|
| The first two claimants sold exclusive rights to photograph their wedding to the third claimant. A paparrazzi infiltrated the wedding and then sold his unauthorised photographs to the defendants, who now appealed injunctions restraining them from publishing them. Held. Interlocutory injunctions restraining publication of the unauthorised photographs were lifted. A right of privacy could be derived from the equitable doctrine of confidence. The Act required respect to be given to respect for private and family life. Particular regard could be had to relevant codes of practice and conduct. In this case the Press Complaints Commission's code applied. The new law required a remedy not just for those whose trust had been abused, but also for those whose privacy had been invaded. Sedley LJ said: "We have reached a point at which it can be said with confidence that the law recognises and will appropriately protect a right of personal privacy." |
| Human Rights Act 1998 12(3) |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'Prolonid': Application No 2113102 INV 9705; INV 9705 |
|
21 Dec 2000 TMRDr W Trott |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Invalidity |
| [ PO ] |
| | |
| Mark: UNITED 2060452, 2068413 |
|
22 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| IPO Opposition. |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| 'United': Application No 2060452 -v- 2068413 OPP 45886 / 45892; OPP 45886 / 45892 |
|
22 Dec 2000 TMRMr M Reynolds |
Intellectual Property |
|
| cw Inter Partes Decisions - Trade Marks - Opposition |
| Link[s] omitted |
| | |
| United (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o47900 |
|
22 Dec 2000 IPO |
Intellectual Property |
|
|
| [ Bailii ] |
|