Links: Home | swarblaw - law discussions

swarb.co.uk - law index


These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases.  









Personal Injury - From: 1849 To: 1899

This page lists 15 cases, and was prepared on 14 November 2014.


 
 Longmeid -v- Holliday; 1851 - (1851) 6 Ex 761; [1851] EngR 583; (1851) 6 Exch 761; (1851) 155 ER 752

 
 Mitchell And His Wife, -v- Chrassweller and Another; 27-Jan-1853 - [1853] EngR 174; (1853) 13 CB 237; (1853) 138 ER 1189
 
Wootton -v- Dawkins [1857] EngR 408; (1857) 2 CB NS 412; (1857) 140 ER 477
18 Apr 1857


Personal Injury, Torts - Other
The plaintiff entered the defendant’s garden at night, and without his permission, to search for a stray fowl, and, whilst looking closely into some bushes, he came in contact with a wire, which caused something to explode with a loud noise, knocking him down and slightly injuring his face and eyes: Held, that the defendant was not liable for this injuryt common law, nor, in the absence of evidence that it was caused by a spring-gun or other engine “calculated to inflict grievous bodily harm,” under the statute 7 & 8 G. 4, c. 18, s. I.
[ Commonlii ]
 
Jane Birkett, Executrix Of John Birkett, Deceased -v- The Whitehaven Junction Railway Company [1859] EngR 649; (1859) 4 H & N 730; (1859) 157 ER 1029
31 May 1859


Personal Injury

[ Commonlii ]

 
 Limpus -v- The London General Omnibus Company; 1861 - [1861] EngR 53; (1861) 2 F & F 640; (1861) 175 ER 1221

 
 Lynch -v- Knight; HL 1861 - (1861) 9 HLC 577
 
Bolch -v- Smith [1862] EngR 369; (1862) 7 H & N 736; (1862) 158 ER 666
30 Jan 1862


Health and Safety, Personal Injury

[ Commonlii ]

 
 Limpus -v- London General Omnibus Company; CExC 23-Jun-1862 - (1862) 1 H&C 526; [1862] EngR 839; (1862) 1 H & C 526; (1862) 158 ER 993

 
 Read -v- Great Eastern Railway Company; 1868 - [1867-78] LR 3 QB 555
 
Foulkes -v- Metropolitan District Railway Co (1880) 5 CPD 157
1880


Personal Injury, Contract
The court considered the liability of a railway company where the plaintiff had bought his ticket from one railway company, but claimed liability from another which had undertaken responsibility for part of the services to be rendered to the plaintiff under the contract evidenced by the ticket.
1 Citers


 
Haigh -v- Royal Mail Steampacket Co Ltd [1883] 52 LJ QB 640
1883
CA
Brett MR
Damages, Personal Injury
“‘personal injury’ is not ‘loss’ because a limb may be broken without being lost. The word ‘injury’ would certainly have been more apt, but the word ‘damage’ can certainly mean personal injury”.
1 Citers


 
Brunsden -v- Humphrey (1884) 14 QBD 141
1884
CA
Bowen LJ
Personal Injury, Damages
The defendant had negligently caused damage to a cab driver and his vehicle in the same accident. The cab driver obtained damages for the damage to his vehicle. Held: He was not disentitled from bringing fresh proceedings for damages for personal injury. There were two causes of action. Bowen LJ discussed the single action rule, saying: "Nobody can doubt that if the plaintiff had recovered any damages for injury to his person, he could not have maintained a further action for fresh bodily injuries caused by the same act of negligence, merely because they had been discovered or developed subsequently." The rule is based on the maxim interest rei publicae ut sit finis litium, "otherwise great oppression might be done under colour and pretence of law."
1 Citers



 
 Wakelin -v- London and South Western Railway Co; HL 1886 - (1886) 12 App Cas 41

 
 Joseph Smith (Pauper) -v- Charles Baker & Sons; HL 21-Jul-1891 - [1891] UKHL 2; [1891] AC 325

 
 Penny -v- Wimbledon Urban District Council; 1898 - [1898] 2 QB 212
 
Copyright 2014 David Swarbrick, 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire HD6 2AG.