How come the judge ordered us to do a second statement citing case law to support our case, when in reality we didn't need to at that point. The defence hasn't even filed and served a serious defence ( he's an LiP, sent a statement to the court not properly done and none to us, more of a letter, which we had to ask for twice from the court) although they appeared in court with a Barrister (second time), who offered no supporting docs, (and still no written defence). It appears we have followed all the protocol only to have at every turn the rules abused in favour of the very shaky defence, and had to give up all our arguements.
The judge didn't know anything about the subject matter and its as if judge wanted us to to give a lesson in the whole subject. Which is what we did (chapeter and verse) or have it chucked out. If that makes sense.
so now all our arguements are on the table and we haven't yet had a defence filed properly, expert evidencce, disclosure, inspection..........etc.
This seems wrong to me.