Speed Investments Ltd and Another v Formula One Holdings Limited and Others: ChD 19 Jul 2004

An application for summary judgment should not be heard at the same time as a challenge to the jurisdiction of the court. That was the price that a plaintiff paid in asking a court to bring a foreign defendant before a court in England – that defendant had to be given opportunity to challenge the jurisdiction of the court.

Judges:

Lewison J

Citations:

Times 10-Sep-2004

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoSpeed Investments Ltd and Another v Formula One Holdings Limited and Others (No 2) ChD 20-Jul-2004
The defendants sought a stay of the action, arguing that proceedings had begun first in Switzerland.
Held: An English court became seised of an action for the purposes of the Convention at the time when the proceedings were served. Under the . .

Cited by:

See AlsoSpeed Investments Ltd and Another v Formula One Holdings Limited and Others (No 2) ChD 20-Jul-2004
The defendants sought a stay of the action, arguing that proceedings had begun first in Switzerland.
Held: An English court became seised of an action for the purposes of the Convention at the time when the proceedings were served. Under the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Civil Procedure Rules

Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.216349