The court heard seven lead claims in group litigation against three drug companies in respect of their combined oral contraceptive products.
Judges:
Mackay J
Citations:
[2002] EWHC 1420 (QB), (2002) 70 BMLR 88
Links:
Citing:
See Also – Afrika and others v Cape Plc and others; X Y Z and Others v Schering health Care Ltd; Sayers and Others v Merck, Smithkline Beecham plc MMR/MR vaccine litigation CA 21-Dec-2001
Claimants sought damages for personal injuries after immunisation with the MMR vaccine. . .
See Also – Sayers and Others v Smith Kline Beecham plc and Others; X, Y, Z and Others v Schering Health Care Ltd and Others; Afrika and Others v Cape plc CA 21-Dec-2001
The case concerned the management of substantial multi-party actions, and in particular the form of costs orders. The claimants sought a payment of the ‘common costs’ element to be made payable as the appropriate relative common issues were . .
Cited by:
Cited – Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd; Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Willmore SC 9-Mar-2011
The Court considered appeals where defendants challenged the factual basis of findings that they had contributed to the causes of the claimant’s Mesothelioma, and in particular to what extent a court can satisfactorily base conclusions of fact on . .
See Also – XYZ v Schering Health Care: Oral Contraceptive Litigation SCCO 31-Mar-2004
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Consumer, Consumer, Personal Injury
Updated: 06 June 2022; Ref: scu.174352
