A garnishee order was not available against a foreign account through a UK branch. The English court continued to exercise its discretion against the making of orders in relation to debts with a foreign situs
Citations:
Times 08-Apr-1994, [1994] CLC 348
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Societe Eram Shipping Company Limited and others v Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corp Ltd, Compagnie Internationale de Navigation HL 12-Jun-2003
The appeal concerned a final third party debt order (formerly a garnishee order). A judgment in France was registered here for enforcement. That jurisdiction was now challenged.
Held: A third party debt order is a proprietary remedy operating . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Banking
Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.90691
