References: [1830] EngR 780, (1830) 1 Russ & My 694, (1830) 39 ER 266
Links: Commonlii
An exception to a report in favour of the title having been on argument allowed, leave was given to the Plaintiff, some time afterwards, to go again before the Master, for the purpose of bringing evidence to shew that the objection which the Court had sustained, was, in the circumstances, immaterial.
This case cites:
- See Also – Egerton -v- Jones (Commonlii, [1830] EngR 487, (1830) 3 Sim 409, (1830) 57 ER 1051)
An estate at C was settled on A for life, remainder to his first and other sons in tail male, remainder to A. in fee. A. devised as follows : ‘As to the reversion and inheritance of the freehold estate at C., purchased by me in pursuance of my . . - See Also – Egerton -v- Jones (Commonlii, [1830] EngR 549, (1830) 3 Sim 392, (1830) 57 ER 1044 (B))
Upon the allowance of exceptions to a report approving of a title, the Court will, on the application of the vendor, refer it back to the Master to review his report, in orders to give the vendor an opportunity of producing evidence to remove the . .
